So, if the war has any validity at all, then the 'enemies' in question would be interested in stabilizing the conflict for the next few years.
At the current pace, there is no question we are in a state of global war in its infancy, as the criminals at the helm continue to pound on the war drum and provide endless hostile inputs where diplomacy should be the norm.
With no provision for diplomacy, the only choice for Russia would be to remove the leaders if they can.
So, lets hold a convention in a tiny little ineffective country, let's configure all the air defense of types already proven useless, practically right next to this so called belligerent global threat.
So, in my opinion, if Russia does not decapitate nato at this stage, then the whole thing is being orchestrated by the controlling factors and both parties in the conflict have no intention of being at 'war'
I would do it. Given the stage and intention of the group, it is the only logical course of action.
CrazyRussian coming in with the cold hard facts.
Well, pffftt, I aint gonna let you burst my bubble. There is a chance that even tho Russia has done everything to the letter on the international stage they recognize it has had zero value, it belongs in the history books to be buried unless Russia wins.
So, I would think that behind the scenes this summit was creeping, tons of time to get the paperwork in order, with conditions to dismiss that could have been met but clearly were not. It would be top secret paperwork that very few would be privy to. Work with me here...
At the end of the day, it is the smartest strategic move made by a committed forward thinking military mind. There is no way the west could/would retaliate.
Immediately disperse words to the relevant countries to begin diplomacy or face nukes locally. They would begin diplomacy. Because everyone already knows the risk of attempting to hit Russia with the sub nukes, likely the only viable option.
What is the point of exterminating puppets? Nothing will change really, TPTB just put another puppets and that's all.
Of course that will look very cool in Western MSM, but as everybody here should already understand, Russian administration don't give a fuck about Western MSM.
If my theory about the great battle for NWO model that would be established is correct, then such move will give nothing or even make NATO stronger. Much better outcome for Russia is silent disintegration of NATO due to discord between members. For now Russia and China outplaying West - their models are more stable, sustainable and they keep population under control even under serious pressure. There is nothing good in that, really, but at least this models do not include all that LGBTXYZ+ crap and child grooming.
It is actually an important historical step that if taken would set precedent and basically set the stage for how the multi polar world ordering is to commence, the attitude and opposition factor is in dire need of reset.
So even tho these puppets themselves have no significant value, the story and the backdrop does. It is all about creating the image. With all of the available inputs, we are already at a stage where once this story is told, Russia is well placed hero status.
If however this is not the story told then who knows.
nato has already basically collapsed it is just not yet in paper. The total amount of capability to deliver in this war has revealed a staggering amount of corruption and useless attempts to be effective, cowardly acts and poor planning. Add this to the complete failure in Syria and the result is clear. It is over.
We are already in for what is now possibly going to be decades of war, it does not matter at this point, a bold move would chill the air and give Russia yet another edge.
Not yet. It needs few more members, preferrably from other sides of world, like Japan, some African country and so on.
Today there is only few discords between NATO members - Greece - Turkey, France - UK and possibly Sweden - Finland. But US still able to keep them calm. NATO could rot in that state for many years, to the pleasure of US MIC.
I don't think I can agree here, there is much more to it than the talking heads in the political sphere. The driving force behind nato is basically the ill conceived thought that unipolarity will survive when used against any contenders.
With a series of failures and improper utilization most people with a mind understand it to be a criminal organization beyond even the MIC in the respective countries.
I think the erosion of nato is pretty clear, now that they have this gust of wind trying to pick them up, they still have some more time, but so far nothing is valid, for me it looks like it is pretty collapsed.
I should have mentioned that I kind of look at them still quite separately, implying that I feel China is being positioned to be the next global power and this is somewhat in conflict with the Russian vision of a true multipolar world.
I feel China is playing upto Russia to define relationships to help obtain its own position, this is the nature of the communism installed there currently.
The globalists behind China are at conflict with Russia and most every other uncontrolled human. This is in my opinion the root of the conflicts we see.
I am not convinced Russia is that type of communist controlled anymore, but what do I know.
China is really "internal empire". China through its history barely show any desire to own the world. And all that was relatively small border conflicts. China is very self-pointed. China need trade customers, not colonies, that is why they going around the world now. West is a limited and unreliable customer, so they are creating customers in other places now. Chineese hopefully understand that their way of living is very different from other civilisations and they will not be able to rule over them,
Russia unfortunately is in the same NWO boat with other countries, thanks to the government. All that post-USSR shit with integration into world economy have consequences. But being separate civilisation like China, it is a player between NWO colleagues.
There is one thing that could be important - NWO idea is mostly Western, so at some point non-Western players could reach the point when the West will be thrown under its own bus, and NWO will be reformatted to something new. If you make a table with NWO agendas and their acceptance by NWO player, you will find that only West is accepting all NWO agendas. Other players have some additional things and some things are not acceptable fundamentally. So NWO with its current agenda could be applied only to the West. And without worldwide acceptance it will not be NWO. So some agendas have to be abandoned and may be some added. That will be decided in the current battles between civilisations.
I don't see any nation or civilisation that have real intention to destroy NWO and globalists fundamentally. Only rivalry in the NWO formation.
I don't buy it. For example, at the end of WW2 when the ccp took power, the move to communism was a direction asserted by external parties. The same parties that just flipped Russia working in concert for decades.
Currently when looking at the globalist vision, China is the star model player. In many cases the testing and proving ground for the societal concepts that the criminals want to imbue in western civilizations.
I don't believe this has anything to do with any 'Chinese Vision'. More that China is a tool used as the leadership is manipulated.
China has been ruled over for a very long time. The question in my mind is who is setting the direction and where do these ideas come from.
Without question this has been the case since the attempt to normalize with the west. However from what I can tell there has been great success in removing many facets of the implemented process over the years.
Returning to the capability to be internalized as much as possible is a key indicator.
I personally think nwo is working outside of China and operating China with the vast wealth collected.