Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

8
()
posted 2 years ago by pkvi 2 years ago by pkvi +10 / -2
7 comments share
7 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (7)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– sun_wolf 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

You honestly don’t think Trump is hip to the Jews? That’s like saying he truly believes the official 9/11 narrative, or that he believes Oswald acted alone. Probably before he was President but certainly after, he was informed or made aware of all kinds of top secret shit. He’s probably read all the JFK files. Think about it logically. Think about what he would have had to deal with building real estate in New York.

The question is how do you go after the bloodlines and the central banks and the intelligence agencies and be effective? Does he come out on day one of his Presidency and start questioning the Holocaust based on secret documents he’s read? That might be temporarily satisfying, but would it be effective? Would people even believe him? Would people be ready to believe him?

Even for Trump to come out against the official 9/11 narrative would be very tricky, strategically, and people should be less attached to that one because it is more recent, and it has these disastrous Middle East wars attached to them. Imagine you are advising Trump and you want to disclose the truth about 9/11. How do you do it? And don’t just say call a press conference and disclose it because the press conference gets censored and there are a thousand articles within about an hour “debunking” it. They also probably misreport what was said and do a “drink bleach” rewrite. So now what? Have you effectively “set the record straight”? Or have you strategically shot yourself in the foot?

permalink save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - nxltw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy