At what distance do you expect one to be able to see the curvature?
322,000 feet is roughly 60 miles. The Earth's supposed circumference is roughly 25,000 miles. The distance traveled upwards is roughly .02% of the Earth's circumference.
Comparing this relative to a basketball, that is roughly .006 of an inch off the ball that has a circumference of 29.5 inches which translates to roughly 1/6th of a millimeter from the surface.
If you were a small fraction of the size of a grain of sand, 1/6th of a millimeter above the ball's surface, do you think it would appear round from that perspective? I would have a hard time saying yes to that.
Please feel free to correct me if I'm retarded when it comes to the math.
If I travel 24,901 miles, the earth's circumference, then the drop is 0 inches and not 4960478408 inches.
I like how you tell other people they are stupid but then use the 8 inches per inch squared, which is obviously wrong.
Additionally, if the earth was flat then the star system would look the same in North America vs. South America. But it doesn't - and you can't explain it.
Additionally, if the earth was flat then the star system would look the same in North America vs. South America.
Why do you think that?
If the earth were flat, then the stars would obviously look exactly the same as they currently do...
But it doesn't - and you can't explain it.
I can explain most anything, as you can - but that doesn’t make our explanations correct. Explanations without adequate validation are merely mythology.
dude the stars in the southern hemisphere are different than the ones in the northern hemisphere because we are on a giant ball. Even snipers have to take in the curvature of the earth when firing. Stop smoking the CIA crack.
a) looking implies through the perspective of each different one.
b) one among other ones can only look at perceivable differences...others suggest sameness to distract from that.
c) ones perspective implies as partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable)
d) "Due to extreme delusion produced on account of a partial viewpoint, the immature deny one aspect and try to establish another. This is the maxim of the blind men and the elephant."
At what distance do you expect one to be able to see the curvature?
322,000 feet is roughly 60 miles. The Earth's supposed circumference is roughly 25,000 miles. The distance traveled upwards is roughly .02% of the Earth's circumference.
Comparing this relative to a basketball, that is roughly .006 of an inch off the ball that has a circumference of 29.5 inches which translates to roughly 1/6th of a millimeter from the surface.
If you were a small fraction of the size of a grain of sand, 1/6th of a millimeter above the ball's surface, do you think it would appear round from that perspective? I would have a hard time saying yes to that.
Please feel free to correct me if I'm retarded when it comes to the math.
Always further than you can check/verify/validate friend... Coincidence?
farther*
Tomayto tomaughto
Yes, please.
Bonneville flat earth proof in utah. Alt link cause youtube wants you to sign in for "some reason".
https://www.y2mate.com/youtube/6s-XeP8T06o
Radius is 3900 miles.
http://walter.bislins.ch/bloge/index.asp?page=Advanced%20Earth%20Curvature%20Calculator
http://walter.bislins.ch/blog/media/CurveCalcNoRefraction2.png
Should be tilting down bruh.
And sportsball is for fags.
you people are so fucking stupid
They are fake. Don’t be gullible.
It’s spam.
No shit, subhuman. So you’re now on record holding diametrically opposed positions in the same fucking thread. How are you not a paid shill, exactly?
If I travel 24,901 miles, the earth's circumference, then the drop is 0 inches and not 4960478408 inches.
I like how you tell other people they are stupid but then use the 8 inches per inch squared, which is obviously wrong.
Additionally, if the earth was flat then the star system would look the same in North America vs. South America. But it doesn't - and you can't explain it.
But keep on believing that CIA psyop garbage.
Why do you think that?
If the earth were flat, then the stars would obviously look exactly the same as they currently do...
I can explain most anything, as you can - but that doesn’t make our explanations correct. Explanations without adequate validation are merely mythology.
dude the stars in the southern hemisphere are different than the ones in the northern hemisphere because we are on a giant ball. Even snipers have to take in the curvature of the earth when firing. Stop smoking the CIA crack.
a) looking implies through the perspective of each different one.
b) one among other ones can only look at perceivable differences...others suggest sameness to distract from that.
c) ones perspective implies as partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable)
d) "Due to extreme delusion produced on account of a partial viewpoint, the immature deny one aspect and try to establish another. This is the maxim of the blind men and the elephant."
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/e6/aa/18/e6aa1869343f0cd0f3719e6a5d934b9f.jpg