Who doesn't enjoy a good strawman argument?
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (45)
sorted by:
What a fucking jack ass piece of shit; 2001, a Space Odyssey, looks more realistic than the fake moon landings, and it was released in early 1968.
Not sure why you got the downvotes. But they never used CGI for those movies, it was all scale models, or physically building the sets, which in many cases can look better than CGI.
Ah, I see. Thanks.
The production quality was horrible on the moon landings. A shitty star trek episode. You can clearly see its a small set, the light never changes in the distance and they never go off into the distance. When you use that shitty budget and only release copies that are low res then its hard to tell. If you can look at those and think they're real then you probably believe the twin towers didn't collapse from explosoves
Exactly man, which, unfortunately, is about half of the population. Obviously a lot more than half the population believes some of this stupid shit, but a lot of those people just believe it because they don't turn their TV off long enough to form their own opinions.