X-Men: The Last Stand - Is that predictive programming for the death shots? You be the judge.
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (11)
sorted by:
One has 100% chance of being repeated on mainstream media, the other has less % chance and it will be pretty general.
If I have to explain something so simple to you, then I am sure you don't even get what predictive programming means. But I know you have to spend a lot of psychology learning to understand how programmable humans are to believe any tale.
You seem to not know the difference though. I guess they are successful with some of you. Or are you just a shill to divert the attention? In both cases, you're just a waste of time.
"You now see anyone who tried to warn you as the enemy, and yourself as helpless." - I like that one. It shows that you don't use arguments to make conclusions. You're like a feminist - empty insults, but repeat them enough and the foolish mass with get on board. :D I like when fools try to speak. It almost seems like they're thinking. But you just focus your anger on what you disagree without even questioning the topic for a second. I like to study your behavior. The biggest stupidity of the human kind right at the age of information. :D You're a living paradox. Or just a liar. :D
You seemed to have crafted an entire narrative on who I am within your mind. And then proceeded to talk down to me, calling me an idiot and a liar.
Why? There was no cause for that.
I can literally say the very same of that very sentence. This is meaningless. Why didn't you bolster you theories instead? Why turn to name calling?
Have you even clicked on my name? Has your research on me even gone far enough to delve into my recent submissions and replies? I don't think they have. I don't think you're actually doing as you claim you are.
Now back on topic. I can assure you Sir, that cautionary tales exist. They date back to before the dawn of pictography, and man could only point and grunt at danger.
Is there something to argue here? I don't think there is. Please inform me, of how that my basic assertion is in error.
Wow, so easy to cherry-pick what you like from my previous comment. Tell me you're a shill without telling me you're a shill.
I have seen a lot of shills like you to suggest "turn the other way and don't look at the evidence". In the long term, it makes no difference. At least someone will check both scenarios and realize the truth.
Your tactic to make people "turn the other way" will work only on idiots. Thankfully, my tactic remains with the intelligent ones. There's at least a single user that is not as demented as you think he/she is.
You exhaust people with long replies. You cherry-pick the replies that taken out of context seem bad. But there's at least one person in here that will track the whole conversation. That's actually enough for me. I don't need a 100 idiots, who will disagree. I need one smart person to investigate the topics.
Let's see who comes on top. Your strategy of "looking the other way and pretending reality doesn't really exist", or a person willing to spend 15 minutes researching the topics we've mentioned?
I write this comment only for those, who are willing to research. Only they deserve the answer. Not some username, whose aim is to divert the attention in all his posts/comments. Yes, I know what you do in different posts and I will expose you about it.
To anyone with a working brain - just research predictive programming. What is the last emotion that the propaganda movie left you with? Anger? Fear? This guy's comment to make you DOUBT? :D Easy tactics. He/she is only working you to ignore the evidence that you can spend 10 minutes researching and confirming for yourself.
These aren't even mutually exclusive concepts.
You addressed nothing that I said.
That was just weird.
Well I did. And you freaked out, because I did the thing you asked me to do in your title.
...Again. Really weird.