Nonsense. How can they confirm this? And why serious question are foreign diplomats still supposedly going to Kiev if this was the case?

At what point serious question has Kiev been hit?

Properly? Since Syria there seems to be new rules of engagement.

Because any other war, traditional concept of warfare not this other game of cat and mouse. An enemy's ability to command the battlefield is destroyed. Command structures are targeted and destroyed. As well as infrastructure.

Instead like Syria, since Syria the Capital isn't targeted. Presidential compounds. Command structures are largely intact. Utilities unless zones of conflict haven't been halted. Meanwhile there are dumber narratives of dignitaries treating directly with Kiev every 5 minutes.

The risk? Sod off.

In fact there is almost nothing logical about the traditional concept of war happening in this conflict. Least of all air superiority.

Understandably it might prove certain risk. Importantly it shows Russia is subservient to different tactics. These seemingly are acquisition of territory to later deal with any existing hierarchy from a notion of truce. Instead of seriously winning any conflict. A prop being used for agenda.

It ain't what those claims are?

Because it is still providing Ukraine with ample resistance. So this war drags driven by other motivations.

Until it's another freaking narrative. A smokescreen duping out its concepts. They are simply the motions of something else.