Will the sheeple ever wake up?
(pomf2.lain.la)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
If oneself utilizes free will of choice to shear off suggested information, which one willingly held onto, then the wool over ones eyes disappears within perceivable inspiration.
a) reality represents motion, so there's no stopping it by those within.
b) start (inception) and stop (death) implies ongoing motion for those temporarily living within, yet the suggested meaning of start (out of nothing) and stop (into nothing) tempts one to ignore ongoing motion, and ignorance represents ones lack of self discernment about being moved.
c) both creationism (out of nothing) and collectivism (we) are being suggested by others to tempt one (partial within whole) to ignore transmutation (whole transmuting into partial).
d) reality was before those within came to be, fiction represents ones choice to ignore reality (perceivable inspiration) for fiction (suggested information).
e) others don't create reality, they suggest layers of fiction (suggestion information), which ones consent upholds (within mind/memory) over reality (perceivable inspiration).
a) a point implies the end of a sentence, which tempts one to ignore ones "life sentence", hence still being alive and kicking.
b) suggesting points represents progressivism, which tempts others to want suggested outcomes, while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable origin.
Example... "my point is that cake is delicious", which tempts you to want or not want to eat the cake as to see my point; its deliciousness. Suggested appetite (want or not want) tempts one to ignore perceivable hunger (need).
Sleight of hand: "the cake is a lie"...