I wouldn't know. I'm straight but I don't remember a "choice" day either. I have no choice but to believe someone when they say they're born gay. I wasn't, so how could I know? I didn't get to choose my hair color, height, dick size (or in my case, lack thereof) or any other physical aspect.
A simple summation of my beliefs. I believe different aspects play a role. A dominant cause is external stimuli, such as chemical exposure or social conditioning. I've met a few people when I was young everyone knew was gay (very rare). I think a small percentage fit that. I believe a great deal of people who claim to be gay were not born that way
It is an orientation brought on by experience. Like any other instinct. How is experience gained, environment, background, trauma, desire, and preference. Traits gained by interaction and choice.
Children develop, they have no experience. Choice becomes cursory from experiences, turning into preference becoming an instinct.
Rogue genes are an excuse. An excuse that provides guilt or attempts to condone. They exist in the tiniest percentages, and they fundamentally do not mean a child acts any differently.
No, it isn't. Not that I agree with it or choose it.
It's a product of experience through choice and environment, causing instinct and preference. Hormones develop causing interaction causing experience.
Although any experience probably develops younger. I am sure we've seen kids, kiss, far younger than puberty as example. Let's suggest an environment was around a babysitter or parents or older siblings having sex that a child possibly encountered, it could try to mimic, like kissing, and experiment and interact. Let's suggest trauma, abuse, or a restricted environment limiting choice. Let's suggest rejection or rebellion. Let's suggest choice becoming a habit an addiction a desire.
By suggesting it's a rogue gene is ignorant. Trans use this, and it is dumbfounded. Because Trans not in their majority have defects such as abnormal genitals, like conjoined twins, or supposed chromosone imbalances. But they will still develop into their natural biology and would anyway if it weren't for choice by medicine. Until it becomes an excuse by medicine to keep promoting experiments. Until it has nothing to do with Trans. Rather Transhumanism.
The fact is mammals are bisexual, far more so in domesticated and restricted environments. It will always be this case in this species having sex.
Psychology and medicine need to provide a reason often as an excuse condoning or simply tolerating because it profits. The fact is hormones drive sex. How that sexuality develops is by interaction and experience becoming choices. No other dysfunction.
It is not, it is a moral choice like the freedom to deprive your free will to Catholicism, Christianity, Islam, Judaism or Communism.
Do you choose to be straight?
I wouldn't know. I'm straight but I don't remember a "choice" day either. I have no choice but to believe someone when they say they're born gay. I wasn't, so how could I know? I didn't get to choose my hair color, height, dick size (or in my case, lack thereof) or any other physical aspect.
"Our 2 years old baby boy decided to be a trans-slut like his 2 mommies! What a wonderful coincidence!"
A simple summation of my beliefs. I believe different aspects play a role. A dominant cause is external stimuli, such as chemical exposure or social conditioning. I've met a few people when I was young everyone knew was gay (very rare). I think a small percentage fit that. I believe a great deal of people who claim to be gay were not born that way
It is an orientation brought on by experience. Like any other instinct. How is experience gained, environment, background, trauma, desire, and preference. Traits gained by interaction and choice.
Children develop, they have no experience. Choice becomes cursory from experiences, turning into preference becoming an instinct.
Rogue genes are an excuse. An excuse that provides guilt or attempts to condone. They exist in the tiniest percentages, and they fundamentally do not mean a child acts any differently.
Homosexuality is a defect, a disfunction.
No, it isn't. Not that I agree with it or choose it.
It's a product of experience through choice and environment, causing instinct and preference. Hormones develop causing interaction causing experience.
Although any experience probably develops younger. I am sure we've seen kids, kiss, far younger than puberty as example. Let's suggest an environment was around a babysitter or parents or older siblings having sex that a child possibly encountered, it could try to mimic, like kissing, and experiment and interact. Let's suggest trauma, abuse, or a restricted environment limiting choice. Let's suggest rejection or rebellion. Let's suggest choice becoming a habit an addiction a desire.
By suggesting it's a rogue gene is ignorant. Trans use this, and it is dumbfounded. Because Trans not in their majority have defects such as abnormal genitals, like conjoined twins, or supposed chromosone imbalances. But they will still develop into their natural biology and would anyway if it weren't for choice by medicine. Until it becomes an excuse by medicine to keep promoting experiments. Until it has nothing to do with Trans. Rather Transhumanism.
The fact is mammals are bisexual, far more so in domesticated and restricted environments. It will always be this case in this species having sex.
Psychology and medicine need to provide a reason often as an excuse condoning or simply tolerating because it profits. The fact is hormones drive sex. How that sexuality develops is by interaction and experience becoming choices. No other dysfunction.
LGBTsexuals are not because of a rogue gene, it's because of indoctrination and moral choice.
All people are born straight.