Be fair to vaccines, they are among the many causes, mostly better hygiene, of a reduction in all infectious diseases. Few but vaccine shills say they were the only cause.
Not under the definition of vaccine that the world operated under before they changed it to include mRNA injections, but I understand what you're saying and generally agree.
Ask the next vaxtard you see whether he would prefer to be stranded on a desert isle with a) antibiotics and clean water or b) every vaccine on the planet
I guarantee they will choose the latter. Encourage him to get a triple portion of the cutter polio
Sadly, there is no science behind vaccines. I know that seems odd, since so many 'scientists' are being paid to study them, but they're not doing science.
Be fair to vaccines, they are among the many causes, mostly better hygiene, of a reduction in all infectious diseases. Few but vaccine shills say they were the only cause.
Germ theory opponents hardest hit?
By that measure, vitamin C & D work too - and should be considered "vaccines".
Not under the definition of vaccine that the world operated under before they changed it to include mRNA injections, but I understand what you're saying and generally agree.
correct - and assuming the legacy definition was ever sufficiently accurate.
Ask the next vaxtard you see whether he would prefer to be stranded on a desert isle with a) antibiotics and clean water or b) every vaccine on the planet
I guarantee they will choose the latter. Encourage him to get a triple portion of the cutter polio
I don't think people deny the science behind vaccines, the question is at what cost?
Sadly, there is no science behind vaccines. I know that seems odd, since so many 'scientists' are being paid to study them, but they're not doing science.