Your not wrong. But its not like the answers are predetermined in a list.

https://engineering.mit.edu/engage/ask-an-engineer/can-a-computer-generate-a-truly-random-number/

But thats not the issue here. And this is a funny topic to bring up because I watched an older movie the other week where they were assassinating people determined by binary code in weaving cloth lol. Sounded like a freemason thing for sure. And the 4chan post is interesting because they could also be talking to some inter dimensional entity, or even one of our creators uploaded into some kind of device. But hell its possible it could be someone from the future.

I also think that we are back engineering lost or recovered technology but that doesnt explain the sudden boost in the last 20 years. Maybe whoever they are talking to is exchanging technology for favors. Im pretty sure that was another theory floating around I heard.

But to get back to the original point of this post.

Its been proven that humans can influence RNG.

Experiments conducted and repeated worldwide over the last five decades have claimed to show that human consciousness, intention or thought (often termed ‘psychokinesis’ or ‘telekinesis’) can have an effect on random number generators. The reason for this, or even its acceptance by mainstream science, is still uncertain. Quantum mechanics or some other as yet undiscovered aspect of the natural world is typically preferred as a tentative explanation compared to mysticism or invoking the supernatural. Given that many different types of computer programs – even those used in experiments and simulations – rely to some extent on (pseudo)random number generators, any external effect such as this could be significant and should be accounted for. To test if a random number generator used by a computer program could be affected by psychokinesis, we developed a simple program that generated a sequence of 30 random integers between 1 and 10. Along with its mean or average, this constituted one ‘cycle’. Thirty cycles were evaluated and the ‘overall’ average was used as a means of comparing situations where, using two subjects, human thought was directed at increasing or decreasing the values of the numbers generated and where it was not (the control). Consistent with previous ‘successful’ experiments, a small but noticeable and significant effect on the overall averages was present. While this remains fascinating yet of little consequence in and of itself, the potential of a kind of ‘butterfly effect’ in computer systems where random number generators are involved in proximity to humans should be further investigated.

Does anyone remember that rumor on r/conspiracy years ago about the russian team that could shutdown computers with their mind? Most people thought it was bullshit, but theoretically, its possible. Anyway.

Does op want to call this effect god? I am sure thats what the bible refers to when it says "god" but the actual creating of humans, the destruction of the earth in a great flood. These things happened but they have nothing to do with the Abrahamic god, or whatever you choose to call that all pervasive force that unity's everything.

I feel pretty confident that force is not anything like the bible describes it. Sitting on a throne in heaven who is judging you for everything you do, ready to sentence you to hell for the simple act of, not believing.

Hard pill to swallow for me.

Terry Davis and the templeos is a strange rabbithole for sure. He was either crazy, or a genius. lol Never heard of him using the operating system for talking to god, but it wouldnt surprise me. But I think its entirely possible he wasnt talking to god god, but whatever that force is that lies within all living things. I think a soul is proably the best way to describe it lol.

https://youtu.be/moXX8lbnmHs