Game Faces On - mRNA in Our Food
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (15)
sorted by:
This, from consume product. I'm actually terrified of this. There is a good (~100%) chance this is going to make meat truly and acutely poisonous to anyone who didn't also take the poison shots.
Based on what, though?
Because the injections will cause the animals to produce the spike proteins, which will not only trigger an immune response in those animals, but, when we eat this meat, the spike proteins remaining in the animal's blood and tissue will enter our bloodstreams. This will trigger the same immune response as having taken the vaccine (although it won't alter our DNA or permanently program our cells via mRNA insertion). Whenever we eat such meat we will experience some manner of similar symptoms as those who have taken the vaccine, such as blood clots, etc.
An example of this same mechanism at work, but with a different class of proteins, can be seen in those with celiac disease; the gluten proteins enter the bloodstream, and antibodies attack that protein, causing systemic inflammation.
a) suggested (meat) represents the temptation within perceivable (hunger).
b) choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) represents the vector to make temptation poisonous.
c) resisting (need) temptation (want) represents ones free will of choice.
a) one represents reaction (perceiving) within enacting (perceivable), hence the potential effect (reaction) within the actual cause (action).
b) your consent to suggested terrorism tempts you to be afraid of suggested outcomes, while ignoring the need to for your to resist perceivable origin.
c) both fear (not want) and hope (want) are aimed at suggested outcomes, which tempt one to ignore being in-between origin (inception) and outcome (death), hence still alive and kicking (resisting).
d) where did you came out of...suggested or perceivable? If you write "I'm...of this", then how could others define what "this" is when both of you still exist within it?
a) if good represents 100%, then bad doesn't exist...are you "actually" afraid or just ignorant of self imposed contradictions?
b) CHANCE, noun - "effect of an unknown cause"...what if one represents the effect (perceiving) within a known cause (perceivable)? What if self discernment of being effect (living) within cause (process of dying) has to be grown to comprehend that, and what if others can tempt one to ignore growth with suggested "chances" for already grown?
c) how many have to take a chance at gambling for you to realize that the few suggest gambling, because chance (effect of an unknown cause) cannot be, since being implies as effect within known cause?