In any large scale war were Christians and/or Muslims are killing each other, you will usually find the bankers (jews) hand in instigating it.
The crusades are no different.
Interesting facts:
One of the key instigators of the crusades were Peter the Hermit, Peter came from the Orval Abbey in Stenay in the Ardennes.
Who funded that Abbey? The crypto jewish Merovingian family of Lorraine!
Guess who was the first king of Jerusalem during the Crusades time? Godfrey of Bouillon who was taught by none other than Peter the Hermit.
He was put as king of Jerusalem due to his jewish lineage as king of the jews. He was also a descendant of William of Gellone.
Also worth noting how the Venetians (crypto jews who came from Spain/Portugal), sponsored and profited from the crusades, Webster Tarpley's work is valuable on this matter.
If the few suggest abrahamism and the many consent to believe or disbelieve it, then the few gain control over what the many consented to.
a) what if both judaism and socialism are suggested by the few, while the many consented to believe/disbelief in "jew" and "social"? Does nature brand anything a "jew" and does nature bring together (social) or does it set everyone within apart from one another?
b) how could partials (living) within whole (process of dying) commit a crime against natural law (land air water)?
c) CRIME, noun [Latin , Gr. , to separate, to judge, to decree, to condemn.]...what if nature setting itself apart represents separation from whole into partial; judged minds; a decree (division) of oneness (perceivable) into designated units (perceiving) and a condemnation to a "life" sentence?
What if the few suggest both NEO (new) and nazism? What if "neo" from the matrix and "new" world order are suggested by a group of ashke-nazis? Wouldn't the "merchants" utilize "new" to tempt the consumers to discard old? Didn't the ashke-nazi ADL recently suggest that not all nazis are bad when commenting upon the Ukraine narrative? Doesn't the ashke-nazi rothschild (bauer) hold the deed to (apartheid) israel?
...suggesting those within constant change that "truth" can be defined; claimed and held onto without it being changed, hence automatically becoming a "lie".
The foundation for that...suggesting perceiving effect (living) to ignore perceivable cause (process of dying) for whatever is suggested.
You're always there to take me on a wild ride. Thanks.
a) WILD, adjective - "roving; wandering; not tamed or domesticated" aka free will of choice. Consenting to the suggested choices of others tames and domesticates ones free will of choice.
b) WILD (life) RIDE (inception towards death)...the few suggest "wildlife" to distract from that. Add suggested animal (Latin anima; animation) and the animated ride is implied for the wild life within.
c) suggested ALWAYS - "continually; without variation" tempts one to ignore ALL (partials) within WAY (whole), hence being susceptible of change (variable).
d) consider if everyone (partial) has a different view of everything (whole)...unless ignored for consent to the same suggestions by others...norm; mainstream; consensus; society; commune-ism; e pluribus unum (out of many, one), uniformity etc.
Thank you for inspiring me to write.