Hey I saw your post when you posted it, but I've been busy the past 5 days and haven't had the time to read this long article that you posted. I have read it now.

Yeah I've come across Miles Mathis' work. I read a lot of his stuff a few years ago. I remember that he was like an artist or something as his day job. I think I read his stuff on Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, and a few others. I wasn't super impressed at the time. However in general I don't really write people off as "controlled opposition" because you can find problems with pretty much everyone and if you choose to ignore everyone that is "controlled" you will just end up not learning anything. So even if certain people are controlled, there is still some value in what they say.

That said, I just read the link that you sent. I can give you my page by page analysis:

Page 1:

• Mathis uses History.com as evidence. The same channel that has the Ancient Aliens tv show. Using certain evidence to make an elaborate story about ancient man being viewed by aliens from different planets.
• First sentence of the essay he says this is his opinion
• With a lot of this stuff (conspiracy kind of stuff) I feel like anyone can make anyone believe in anything. Examples might include Great Tartaria/New Chronology/Mudfloods, German Breakaway Civilization, and Flat Earth. I used to believe in one of those things but I don't anymore. People can take evidence, manipulate it, and use it for whatever they want. Some of these things can get pretty niche so it can be hard to debunk all of it.
• But basically History.com is not evidence.

Pages 2-4: (Hitler's genealogy)

• Mathis is questioning whether or not Hitler's adoptive father was jewish. It doesn't seem conclusive at all.
• Many jews have German last names.
• Here is some more commentary on this topic.

Page 5:

• Alois Hitler Jr. working at a jewish cafe means nothing because jews controlled tons of industries in the Weimar Republic.

Page 6:

• Comparison of photos. This looks like the same person to me. Alois Hitler Jr. just aged up a bit. He probably also improved his thyroid health and that is why it appears that he lost some weight in his face.

Also just at this point if Hitler's father was jewish and if Hitler was part of some jewish plot then why would he be fighting on the frontlines during WWI? Also he was baptized Catholic. A lot of U.S. military generals presently are jews, but they are and never were in combat roles. Hitler was actually in combat. So if he was jewish and was being groomed to be the leader of Germany, then why would he be in a combat role during WWI?

Page 7-9:

• This is completely speculative and inconclusive. Mathis is just wanting Hitler to be jewish at this point. This is BS. There is no actual proof that Hitler's original familial last name was Hiller or that Hiller was an actual jewish last name. It's possible that jews in Germany were just using that last name Hiller.

Page 10:

• Just going back to my Page 1 commentary... Literally if you bend, twist, and manipulate "evidence" enough you can make anyone believe anything. I have a pretty high standard of proof for things that I believe in. This Hitler genealogical research so far by Mathis is inconclusive.

Page 11:

• This is so stupid at this point. It's so speculative and inconclusive and now Mathis is just claiming that he had proved Hitler's jewishness on the paternal and maternal side.

I'm going to stop reading here. I don't know where this is going. It's just such a long essay. I feel like a lot of these things are designed just to get us running in circles researching things that are misdirection.

I will continue to judge Hitler by his actions. If he was a jew then why would he go out of his way to not bomb Allied historical structures? Why didn't he bomb civilians? Why imprison a Rothschild? Why be in a combat role during WWI?