Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

14
Did Trump support McCarthy for speaker so he'd release the Jan 6th tapes? A quid pro quo like that I can see, because the two rabidly dislike each other on a personal level.
posted 2 years ago by Mad_King_Kalak 2 years ago by Mad_King_Kalak +15 / -1

Just thinking out loud. Title says it all.

32 comments share
32 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (32)
sorted by:
▲ -2 ▼
– Iknowitsu -2 points 2 years ago +1 / -3

That ensures nothing comes from it but polarization and cognitive dissonance.

Why not just release all the tapes to the public? Or to multiple independent journalists?

Not a single logical reason to avoid doing that.

Tucker will run his show and then juxtapose that stuff with a bunch of irrelevant social issues that the left is programmed to react poorly towards.

It’s poisoning the well on a National scale.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Mad_King_Kalak [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

The well is filled with toxins that would make a chemist blush already.

Giving the tapes to Tucker ensures the widest audience, both normie Fox viewers, but also because Tucker is the only guy the OAN crowd and The_Donald commentators will watch on Fox (or from YouTube clips); and that's why I suppose that he was chosen as the outlet.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -2 ▼
– Iknowitsu -2 points 2 years ago +1 / -3

It doesn’t ensure the widest audience.

Releasing it to the public would have resulted in greater exposure because Tucker would still be free to run his segment.

He just wouldn’t be the only one.

They literally use Tucker to politically neutralize important stories.

The left can simply ignore this now.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Mad_King_Kalak [S] 0 points 2 years ago +1 / -1

Seems like a pretty wide audience to me, it's all over social media, the Dems are pissed as is McConnell (but I repeat myself). Tucker is the highest rated news show on TV. Can't get wider than that, mon ami.

It's video, it has to be a visual medium, so you can exclude the NYT as a viable option.

Likewise, no lefty outlet would run the story.

Besides, they will ignore it anyway, or complain, which they have done both of, and when on God's green earth do you think it would change anyone's mind on anything? Sorry, that's just silly to think so, or worse, use it as an argument for why releasing it to Tucker was some sort of bad decision.

So whatcha got left?


Source: "Tucker Carlson Tonight" on Fox News has become the highest-rated news show in cable history, with 5.359 million average viewers and 1.003 million viewers in the advertiser-coveted age demographic of 25 to 54 according to Nielsen Media Research. https://www.thewrap.com/cable-news-primetime-ratings-fox-news-tucker-carlson-october-2020/

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
... continue reading thread?

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - lf7fw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy