Criminal Khazarians: Holding in Bakhmut is Beyond Retarded
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (57)
sorted by:
I hate to get overly optimistic, but it seems like "They" are coming unraveled and can't keep everyone on the same page. I collected these headlines just this morning:
Zelensky at odds with top general – Bild: Commander Zaluzhny called for a withdrawal from a key city, but the president has refused, the newspaper reported
Zelensky Says Ukraine’s Top Generals Want to Keep Fighting for Bakhmut
Pentagon chief downplays importance of besieged Donbass city: The fall of Artyomovsk –called Bakhmut by Ukraine– won’t mean Russia has changed the tide of battle, Lloyd Austin believes
They're beyond the point of telling you a lie and have to tell you all the lies.
hahahahah, yes it does read that way.
At this point the entire thing is a song and dance show.
I am still not sure where Russia stands, I like to think they are not just doing the banker war thing internally also, but there is no way to tell.
As far as Russia and Putin, I've studied them both for many years and have concluded that they are completely anti-NWO. In fact, I believe the Special Military Operation started a year ago will, in the fullness of time, come to mark the point where the tide was finally turned against them.
Now that's a helluva tall claim and I would never ask anyone to take my word for it, but I do have a suggestion: keep that thesis in mind as evidence comes before you and look for two different things.
One is concrete counter-evidence. By that I mean, when you think you've got something solid against the thesis, take the time to validate it. You'll very often find it ends up coming from unidentifiable sources. (And I'll tell you who it was: the CIA.)
The other is anomalous evidence, something that you have to fit into the picture yourself. Take this story, for example: RUSSIA REPORT: PUTIN
It was written back in 2014 and concerns an encounter in 1992. It's part of the picture I have built over time of Putin, and doesn't match any characterization given by either the mainstream or even conspiracy theorists.
Did some disinfo agent plant that to fool the handful of people like myself who might trip over it? I suppose it's possible, but if they did, They are so far ahead it doesn't matter what we do.
Counterpoint: Putin is 100% behind WEF's plans of agenda 2030. Is this because he's fooled by their "environmentally sustainable" schtick? Could be that simple, Idk.
Can link you a Putin speech demonstrating this. It's very long; all his speeches are, you know that.
Question: is Russia's central bank majority Rothschild owned? I honestly don't know. I did read conflicting claims that it is, and that Putin changed that in 2018. He did NOT "tie the ruble to gold," but that move did help the ruble.
Obviously, we could undo the perverse relationship between the Fed and our US Treasury, and need to. I understand wanting a hero, and wishing Putin was it.
As far as his personal wealth, this is a Western Intelligence legend. They can't even resist tipping their hand in their own writings. Take this story, for example:
An investigation on how Vladimir Putin profits from the vices of the Russians (2/28/2023)
In addition to the overblown artwork, we get this sentence right up front:
Yes indeed, it's just a "story" and it is not credible. Take a look around for evidence of this wealth. Do you ever see it?
No, there's no trace of it. He wears ordinary dark suits and what looks like a Timex watch. The Presidential plane is the size of a 737. No photos of him in his mansions or on his yachts or with his collections of European sports cars and race horses. Nothing.
His office is clearly set up for work, not ceremony. I'm sure he's taken other days off in the last ten years, but I've only seen two days documented. Both were simple day trips into the woods with his friend, Defense Minister Shoigu. There was one other "working" day he spent working out and eating lunch with Medvedev.
As far as Putin "changing", he was switched out with a body double starting as early as 2010, and the last time I saw the real Putin was in 2013. Anyone that does not take this into account I feel cannot really be said to be paying attention.