I'll check it out. Do I have faith in NASA, not much. I believe they are gatekeepers to knowledge of extraterrestrials, there are claims/proof of them airbrushing certain satellite/probe images, as well as cutting their ISS feeds when strange objects enter the frame. However, I haven't been presented with anything credible over the years proving that rovers/probes travelling outside of Earth aren't real.
Definitely not a good look to selectively remove images regardless of the justification, I agree. I wonder what they didn't like specifically in this one...
Prove to me we didn't, and then I'll believe you. Isn't the point of being in a niche conspiracy forum observing objective data, thinking for yourself, and resisting group think?
It varies depending on the orbital cycle of Earth and Mars, a quick Google search will provide you with the specific range. I would also check your attitude, you're coming off condescending when I believe I asked a legitimate question regarding the thread's title.
OP is a flat-earther, that's all the reason he needs to believe the Mars rover missions are fake.
Having said that, there have been various, seeming "goofs" down through the years of Rover missions that lead even non-flattie NASA skeptics to think the Mars missions are being faked. If you also believe the Gemini and Apollo missions of the 60's and 70's were largely faked, as was the behemoth "SkyLab", then you have good reason to also be skeptical of NASA's Mars mission claims.
That is fair, and I'd actually agree there is a good chance that the moon landing was faked. Not because of the some belief of flat-Earth or because the moon is a flat plane, but rather for psyop purposes to "beat the Russians." At the end of the day though, with sufficient time and resources (which is certainly true in this case), its completely within possibility to send probes/drones outside of Earth.
What is fake about the mission at Mars? Why would you think that?
https://astroengineer.wordpress.com/2010/04/07/a-curiosity-of-spirit-full-document/ read this and revisit your faith in NASA and gov
I'll check it out. Do I have faith in NASA, not much. I believe they are gatekeepers to knowledge of extraterrestrials, there are claims/proof of them airbrushing certain satellite/probe images, as well as cutting their ISS feeds when strange objects enter the frame. However, I haven't been presented with anything credible over the years proving that rovers/probes travelling outside of Earth aren't real.
This photo from nasa website that has since been removed doesn't inspire a lot of confidence in apollo 11 lunar lander but YMMV https://web.archive.org/web/20190126193910/https://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-40-5922HR.jpg. original link is 403 http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-40-5922HR.jpg
Definitely not a good look to selectively remove images regardless of the justification, I agree. I wonder what they didn't like specifically in this one...
Hol Up Hol Up
You actually beleive we sent a robotic vehicle to the surface of mars.
You're on a niche conspiracy forum and you actually beleive we did that shit..
Prove to me we didn't, and then I'll believe you. Isn't the point of being in a niche conspiracy forum observing objective data, thinking for yourself, and resisting group think?
How far away is Mars from Earth according to your pseudo-science literature?
It varies depending on the orbital cycle of Earth and Mars, a quick Google search will provide you with the specific range. I would also check your attitude, you're coming off condescending when I believe I asked a legitimate question regarding the thread's title.
Fuck off
I'll think about it and get back to you
OP is a flat-earther, that's all the reason he needs to believe the Mars rover missions are fake.
Having said that, there have been various, seeming "goofs" down through the years of Rover missions that lead even non-flattie NASA skeptics to think the Mars missions are being faked. If you also believe the Gemini and Apollo missions of the 60's and 70's were largely faked, as was the behemoth "SkyLab", then you have good reason to also be skeptical of NASA's Mars mission claims.
That is fair, and I'd actually agree there is a good chance that the moon landing was faked. Not because of the some belief of flat-Earth or because the moon is a flat plane, but rather for psyop purposes to "beat the Russians." At the end of the day though, with sufficient time and resources (which is certainly true in this case), its completely within possibility to send probes/drones outside of Earth.
Perhaps the psyop was "beat the Russians" but the ACTUAL mission was "pacify the sheep for the next 100 years and replace God with outer space"...
Because then people want to fund NASA instead of churches.
It seems to have worked a bit.
I don't know what the truth ultimately is. Its certainly possible. Who knows.