Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

4
Starlink 'global' coverage.... Riiiiight. (satellitemap.space) Fake News
posted 2 years ago by YuuugeAsshoe 2 years ago by YuuugeAsshoe +7 / -3
Starlink satellite tracker
Live view of SpaceX starlink satellite constellation and coverage.
satellitemap.space
12 comments share
12 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– YuuugeAsshoe [S] 2 points 2 years ago +6 / -4

Starlink allegedly has thousands of satellites orbiting the earth so I would expect them to have service everywhere from New York to the Gobi Desert to the middle of the Pacific. Clearly the satellites are more sparse at the poles so let's allow some leeway there. In this 3D chart the green hexagons represent general areas with coverage. The red dots represent ground stations, and the white dots represent starlink satellites. Why do all the coverage areas seem to correlate to ground stations? Why does alaska have some coverage despite having almost no satellites overhead? Why don't we have global coverage? Especially out at sea where there are no national laws to maneuver around for service? Could it be starlink operates like the rest of the internet? They rely on land based towers to transmit/receive, and they require land and sea cables to form a network? Why are most of these satellites useless when they are not orbiting over one of the few service areas on earth? There is no such thing as Orbiting Satellites in space, and the earth is flat.

permalink save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - j6rsh (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy