So when globe theorists argue this point with you, what do they say? That flying over Antarctica is dangerous or the atmosphere is too windy or something?
They say planes would have to travel across thousands of miles of harsh Antarctic lands and if there was an emergency there would be nowhere to land
It’s equally surprising, disappointing, and pathetic that people anywhere let alone here ON A CONSPIRACY forum, don’t question this
Zero polar circumnavigationa completed and when you point that out, they’ll say “it’s been done tons of times… a five second google search could have answered that for you… is this how stupid all flat earthers are?!!”
And it’ll be a link to a 2 hour “documentary” that hardly has any flight footage whatsoever and what little is there isn’t unique to Antarctica
Also, the production company’s website is 404d and anyone who takes a critical look at this should only come to the same conclusion that it doesn’t remotely come close to passing the sniff test
Yet flat earthers are the ones who believe in nonsense
Sorry for asking for any evidence of a globe whatsoever that can stand up to the slightest scrutiny
Nothing gets shilled like flat earth
It’s pretty obvious when you talk flat earth on Twitter, as I can see who these shills follow, etc
Weird how the same accounts pop up and cruising through their history they only seem to care to interact with flat earth topic posts, shilling for the spinning globe fairy tale
Wonder why that could be…
The same faggots come out here on the dot wins, too
Almost none of them know of the Antarctic treaty which would make commercial flights impossible without the approval of international bureaucracy (multiple organizations). However we fly in the north polar circle so I don't see why weather or environmental concerns should be so much more of a problem in the south polar circle. Commercial jets also commonly fly in -40 to -60 degrees, im not sure what the exact limit is, but I'd like to see a aeronautical engineer explain why antartica is mechanically impossible to fly over.
I've seen a few people show me flights that allegedly skim the coast of Antarctica. Heavy investigation has gone into these flight which make the results untrustworthy. Such as the plane going off global tracking with an assumed position nearly the entire journey. Flights being canceled or unbookable as if they were simply for perception. There are some planes with long range capability that may be able to fake it by going much faster than the average commercial jet and using earth's natural jet stream wind over the ocean north of Antarctica.
So when globe theorists argue this point with you, what do they say? That flying over Antarctica is dangerous or the atmosphere is too windy or something?
They say planes would have to travel across thousands of miles of harsh Antarctic lands and if there was an emergency there would be nowhere to land
It’s equally surprising, disappointing, and pathetic that people anywhere let alone here ON A CONSPIRACY forum, don’t question this
Zero polar circumnavigationa completed and when you point that out, they’ll say “it’s been done tons of times… a five second google search could have answered that for you… is this how stupid all flat earthers are?!!”
And it’ll be a link to a 2 hour “documentary” that hardly has any flight footage whatsoever and what little is there isn’t unique to Antarctica
Also, the production company’s website is 404d and anyone who takes a critical look at this should only come to the same conclusion that it doesn’t remotely come close to passing the sniff test
Yet flat earthers are the ones who believe in nonsense
Sorry for asking for any evidence of a globe whatsoever that can stand up to the slightest scrutiny
Nothing gets shilled like flat earth
It’s pretty obvious when you talk flat earth on Twitter, as I can see who these shills follow, etc
Weird how the same accounts pop up and cruising through their history they only seem to care to interact with flat earth topic posts, shilling for the spinning globe fairy tale
Wonder why that could be…
The same faggots come out here on the dot wins, too
Almost none of them know of the Antarctic treaty which would make commercial flights impossible without the approval of international bureaucracy (multiple organizations). However we fly in the north polar circle so I don't see why weather or environmental concerns should be so much more of a problem in the south polar circle. Commercial jets also commonly fly in -40 to -60 degrees, im not sure what the exact limit is, but I'd like to see a aeronautical engineer explain why antartica is mechanically impossible to fly over.
I've seen a few people show me flights that allegedly skim the coast of Antarctica. Heavy investigation has gone into these flight which make the results untrustworthy. Such as the plane going off global tracking with an assumed position nearly the entire journey. Flights being canceled or unbookable as if they were simply for perception. There are some planes with long range capability that may be able to fake it by going much faster than the average commercial jet and using earth's natural jet stream wind over the ocean north of Antarctica.
This guy often covers how airplane logistics prove flat earth. https://youtu.be/jcA3tEr5fa0