There is a dedicated community on this website for Flat Earth [FE] stuff:
https://scored.co/c/flatearthresearch/new
There is no need for FE here on conspiracies IMO. If people want to explore FE they can easily seek it there or elsewhere on the internet.
My position: FE doesn't belong here. I believe the proponents of FE are ruining any chance this forum has to gain a larger following. They are time wasters and trolls who reject logical and reasonable rebuttable of their assertions. If someone disproves their idea they say it's lies and fakery without justification or evidence. If it's tiresome for me it must be annoying for others too, and perhaps it is dissuading lurkers from taking the leap and interacting here. No one should have to spend time wading through FE madness if they didn't seek it out.
My position wont change through argument. That's not what this post is about. I want to know:
Do individual, regular users on Conspiracies support banning FE posts and "discussion" from this forum?
If this motion of mine passes, the FE users would be allowed to stay, but submissions they make claiming the Earth is flat would be removed and result in a 3 day ban.
Comments arguing for FE would be removed too, if they are reported or I see them.
A note on the side bar would be added, making it clear that FE is banned here, and a link to the scored/communities FE community provided.
I think that's fair.
Since voting is easily manipulated, the way we'll decide is this:
Reply below, a top level comment, with either a YAY or NAY
YAY= I want FE banned
NAY= I want FE allowed
1 vote per user
Caveats:
-
Any top level comment without a clear YAY or NAY at the beginning of the comment will be removed.
-
YAYS or NAYS as a reply to a top level comment will not count and will be removed.
-
Provide justification, opinions or suggestions about all this along with your vote, if you like, but place it on a separate line below your YAY or NAY.
-
Replying to users is fine too, as long as you yourself have also made a top level comment with a yay or nay.
-
If a top level comment is edited, the edit history will be checked and the comment may not count or may be removed.
-
We have about 100 regular users/contributors, my estimate, so I hope everyone replies with a YAY or NAY. We'll give it plenty of time to ensure everyone sees this post.
-
Upvotes or Downvotes on comments or on this post will be completely ignored
We're counting YAYs or NAYs from individual users only.
-
Top level comments without a clear YAY or NAY will be removed.
-
Duplicate YAYs or NAYS will be removed.
-
Handshake account YAYs or NAYs are welcome, but they will be scrutinized and possibly ignored if they seem like sock-puppets, regardless of how they are voting. This is to ensure the minimum of vote manipulation.
-
Older accounts with little to no history - or where their last comment was several months or years ago - will also be scrutinized and may not count.
I reserve the right to edit this post based on interactions and suggestions below. I may not have thought of everything. Edits will be labelled and placed at the end of this text.
EDIT
Vote over
Minus sock-puppet accounts it's 61 Nay, 44 Yay.
Most of the nays are casual, non-contributing users banging on about censorship and free speech who don't give a damn about quality content nor FE. I encourage those users to engage with FE instead of ignoring it. If you did that you would probably come to regret voting to allow it in this forum.
Seriously, though.
The entire theory that the atmosphere just stays attached to planet because of gravity and the entire vacuum of space doesn't disperse all those air particles is strange. It makes the globe theory seem kind of bogus.
Also, we orbit the sun and the moon orbits us but we only ever see one side of the moon? That doesn't seem kind of bogus to you? Bunch of spinning balls orbiting around each other but you only see one side of the moon/globe?
Also, the navigation coordinates not working as well in southern hemisphere? maybe true maybe not. Worth investigating more.
Also, all the conditions for life are just too precise and in perfect range. The perfect temperature and air composition and forces at play. The entire big bang theory sounds like magical explosion bullshit to me. Intelligent Design and Creation is more plausible considering accounts of people's after life experiences when they flatlined and came back.
Also, there's so much evidence that moon landing is faked, space satellites and ISS faked, videos of them supposedly in space faked, man how much of a stretch is it to question the models of space and the galaxy?
The easiest proof against the flat earth theory is that you can fly from western hemisphere to eastern hemisphere going either direction, east or west, indicating a globe or circle back again. from cali to hong kong going west or from new york to hong kong going east. How does that work with ice barrier wall in the way?
Also the sunrise and sunset. I don't see sun moving to distance and fading away. It sets on the horizon. It appears at the horizon. It didn't just appear from distance or fade into distance like an airplane.
I'm also not convinced of the firmament or dome. Evidence they present is really sketchy and not convincing. Supposed rockets skipping off firmament or the firmament being water? It's interesting but i'm not convinced yet.
It's actually good to question all this stuff though. You know my children pop quiz me with questions all the time? I don't always have the answers but I like their inquisitive and innocent childish bewilderment toward the world they are newer to.
Just hoping to share some info:
It’s not (solely) “because of gravity”. There are a lot of factors at play such as viscosity, density, friction, etc. Please check this out for an overview:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boundary_layer
And more specifically:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planetary_boundary_layer
Strange, certainly but the standard explanation (relative co-relational rotation) fits, and this doesn’t really have any bearing on the shape of the earth. (Lunar) Tides wouldn’t work on a flat however.
Not a thing afaik. This would be common knowledge.
Very interesting subject highly worthy of discussion:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-tuned_universe
But in no way relavent to the FE discussion
True
A massive one until you can present any kind of evidence or cohesive explanation
I agree, the issue is the people who a)present it as fact and b) always try to shoehorn FE into every discussion - that is literally forum sliding , whether intentional (conscious) or not
Watch out for predators. Many have developed agressive mimicry:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aggressive_mimicry
Shill confirmed. Thanks.