Thailand to BAN Pfizer Jab After Vax Puts Princess in Coma, Insider Claims
(www.infowars.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (35)
sorted by:
Your own words:
So, now do you admit that the study you posted doesn't say that vaccines cause Autism.
Then why post it in the first place?
Are you retarded? Serious question. The data and all the internal communications about the study were leaked. It showed a) the data showed vaccines caused autism. b) They knew this and couldn't make the link go away.
They sat on and massaged the data for YEARS before releasing it which in itself is highly unusual. What they eventually published was a study comparing kids that got shots, to kids that got shots, and guess what? There was no difference. That is a scientific disgrace.
Then
Why
Can
You
Not
Post
A
Single
Quote
That
Supports
Your
Claims
?
I mean what's so fucking difficult about it? Just spamming some links and claiming "there it is" is maybe sufficient to get a conversation started but you really should be able to substantiate your claim but also posting quotes and data within this conversation.
I posted the ACTUAL data, and ACTUAL emails from the study author who I believe went onto to work for GlaxoSmithKline lol. Who do you want a quote from? God?
Here is an article about it if you are really interested
https://greenmedinfo.com/blog/yes-vaccines-cause-autism
a) he's tricking you to spend effort against others instead of for discernment of self.
b) notice that "actual" implies action, while your choice to respond to him represents "reaction".
c) he suggested you to substantiate claims, which tempts one to ignore being substance (living) within essence (process of dying) aka material within immaterial. Any claim of possession the material makes, ignores that the immaterial cannot be claimed, only reacted to.
d) DA'TA, noun - "things given, or admitted"...everything (process of dying) gives to everyone (living), hence everyone only being able to react (perceiving) to everything already given (perceivable)... If one suggests "data"; one admits to ignore that, and consent of admission implies permission for suggestion to enter, hence allowing the vampire in.
The shit that is going on here is way bigger than medical malpractice or covering up the data proving it, but it's being utilized to tempt you to willingly invest yourself into these suggested narratives, which are all controlled by those suggesting them, not by those consenting to reason (prove vs disprove) about them.