Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

13
If that balloon was Chinese spy technology, why did the military blow up the evidence? (youtu.be)
posted 2 years ago by YuuugeAsshoe 2 years ago by YuuugeAsshoe +15 / -2
16 comments share
16 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– IGOexiled 2 points 2 years ago +4 / -2

One interpretation:

A nation of irrelevant identity wishes to fire an icbm into America. Worried of automatically deployed air defense, they hire a friend to test. Is the balloon blown up immediately? What type of missile or flak is used to intercept? What size radar signature illicits a response? The balloon checks for radar locks, to see the source of our detection capabilities. Taking tally of where our defenses are.

Why did the US allow the balloon to fully cross the nation? A) maintains obscurity about the quickness of reflexive response, B) allows for decoy radar nests to deploy, feeding the spy misinformation.

Or maybe Biden sold the US to China and they are gathering some promised intel..

Edit: oh no, downvote the guy who thinks for himself for two seconds. Just be sure not to debate or give a reason for it. Just anonymous downvotes.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– InfidelCastro11 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

Downvoted for reasonable speculation on a conspiracy board.

A) maintains obscurity about the quickness of reflexive response

That actually makes sense. Personally I think it was likely just a media stunt. Wouldn't surprise me if it wasn't even Chinese

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– YuuugeAsshoe [S] 0 points 2 years ago +1 / -1

Why would China be interested in any sort of old school warfare when their 5th gen warfare had been far more effective? The 20 million it took to build that satellite balloon could have been spent on paying off our politicians or military contractors for far more gain than a stupid balloon can get. This is clearly a cover story, but for what is the question? Personally I think they are trying to hide the fact orbiting Satellites don't exist.

Also why did they just change the wiki of the F22 from a ceiling height of 65000ft to 50000ft? The video gives a pretty good reason.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– IGOexiled 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Sure. The balloon was shot down to cover up that the earth is flat, and China has no allies who are currently threatening war with the west.

Good talk.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– InfidelCastro11 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Personally I think they are trying to hide the fact orbiting Satellites don't exist.

By drawing your attention to what you're implying satellites actually are? Doesn't make sense

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– YuuugeAsshoe [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

The public was spotting and recording the balloon anyway, they had to act and form our perception. We all have an idea of what satellites supposedly look like from cgi images and movies. So when people saw what looks like s satellite hanging from a balloon they had to come up with a stupid Chinese cover story. In addition people are more likely to trust their government if they see external threats like China or Russia.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– InfidelCastro11 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

The public won't ever doubt satellites because of a balloon. Still doesn't explain why the media chose to draw even more attention to it, either. They let things die when they don't like it.

If satellites are balloons, these should be spotted way more frequently.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - 9slbq (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy