And of course you're going to have modern experts in dispute about something like the dating of the certain Bible writings in dispute, when the accepted date for a couple millennia would make for some uncomfortable conclusions to some of those experts.
I made another thread about Julian the Apostate. Put your silly snark about that over there.
Tacitus had access to records you don't now, but he did, in the time he lived, including people who were alive at the time Jesus was. You know diddly about historical research.
If your point is that the Platonic Form of Jesus, let's call it, is different from what's in the record, then you're not getting any disagreement from me.
And people have been questioning the historical record of Jesus since the Jews murdered him, and this mostly stems from Jewish influence.
You forgot Tacitus mentioning Jesus.
And of course you're going to have modern experts in dispute about something like the dating of the certain Bible writings in dispute, when the accepted date for a couple millennia would make for some uncomfortable conclusions to some of those experts.
I made another thread about Julian the Apostate. Put your silly snark about that over there.
Tacitus had access to records you don't now, but he did, in the time he lived, including people who were alive at the time Jesus was. You know diddly about historical research.
If your point is that the Platonic Form of Jesus, let's call it, is different from what's in the record, then you're not getting any disagreement from me.
And people have been questioning the historical record of Jesus since the Jews murdered him, and this mostly stems from Jewish influence.