lol, like I give a shit what foolish people believe.
The reason it is mentioned is because the flat earth zealots refuse to consider important issues because they are busy chasing dragons.
Flat earth is there to waste your time, and you love it, who gives a flying fuck what people believe that cannot be proven, I could not care less. If I was to learn the globe is round provably, I would be just as indifferent as if I was to learn it was flat, neither has yet been proven and I give no shits either way.
Feel free to submit any logical flat earth evidence, you have none because it does not exist. Just satirical claims of nonsense of illusion and bad math.
Your entire belief system is exactly like that of some random religion.
Good call mate, indeed. Rest assured convincing somebody of a thing with next to no factual provable claims is going to be difficult.
So what if the images nasa claims as mars are from canada? how does that explain flat earth as a fact? it does not, it merely reveals the likely hood that nasa has got everything wrong, I already have accepted this.
The reason no decent footage is taken of the planet is purely to keep your belief alive, I can accept that also. I can accept that there is no absolute evidence to quell your suggestions completely, big deal? none of this is evidence of any reality surrounding flat earth ideology.
It simply shows that criminals are at the helm misleading everybody best they can, you have fallen for the oldest useless belief that exists. Who cares either way? do you honestly think that even if it is flat that people are in control of that somehow? or they use it to their benefit?
When I first came across you I was hopeful that you had some actual information that I had missed somehow, but no there is nothing new here.
FYI, this title was not for you, it was for some other ignorant fucker, so there is some confusion there also.
Ok, read the rest. It is just an attempt to slight me for not accepting your inputs.
You have yet to provide a single input that is concrete, you simply advertise the standard bullshit rhetoric each believer uses and expect me to lap it up.
I have already reviewed all of this data and it is incorrect or derived from assumptions, it is that simple.
I have never alluded to indicate I am signed onto a round earth, I have suggested I am still looking for actual planetary footage that meets my acceptance. It has never been created.
Round earth model makes much more sense to me, given my current understandings, I can admit that.
I will also state, I do not believe the ball of gas sun model either, I am more inline with plasma cosmology in that regard.
But most importantly, I am more concerned about the shit on the ground, the liars and the criminals get all the attention. Once they are dealt with, I would be willing to spend more time with this.
This is the type of assumption you want to start with:
I already proved the lack of curve to you and it went ovee your head.
You have no respect peabrain. If you recollect what I said is that your inputs are assumptions, how does this not result in the understanding you cannot correctly perform the calculation as your inputs are estimates.
lol, like I give a shit what foolish people believe.
The reason it is mentioned is because the flat earth zealots refuse to consider important issues because they are busy chasing dragons.
Flat earth is there to waste your time, and you love it, who gives a flying fuck what people believe that cannot be proven, I could not care less. If I was to learn the globe is round provably, I would be just as indifferent as if I was to learn it was flat, neither has yet been proven and I give no shits either way.
Feel free to submit any logical flat earth evidence, you have none because it does not exist. Just satirical claims of nonsense of illusion and bad math.
Your entire belief system is exactly like that of some random religion.
Good call mate, indeed. Rest assured convincing somebody of a thing with next to no factual provable claims is going to be difficult.
So what if the images nasa claims as mars are from canada? how does that explain flat earth as a fact? it does not, it merely reveals the likely hood that nasa has got everything wrong, I already have accepted this.
The reason no decent footage is taken of the planet is purely to keep your belief alive, I can accept that also. I can accept that there is no absolute evidence to quell your suggestions completely, big deal? none of this is evidence of any reality surrounding flat earth ideology.
It simply shows that criminals are at the helm misleading everybody best they can, you have fallen for the oldest useless belief that exists. Who cares either way? do you honestly think that even if it is flat that people are in control of that somehow? or they use it to their benefit?
When I first came across you I was hopeful that you had some actual information that I had missed somehow, but no there is nothing new here.
FYI, this title was not for you, it was for some other ignorant fucker, so there is some confusion there also.
Ok, read the rest. It is just an attempt to slight me for not accepting your inputs.
You have yet to provide a single input that is concrete, you simply advertise the standard bullshit rhetoric each believer uses and expect me to lap it up.
I have already reviewed all of this data and it is incorrect or derived from assumptions, it is that simple.
I have never alluded to indicate I am signed onto a round earth, I have suggested I am still looking for actual planetary footage that meets my acceptance. It has never been created.
Round earth model makes much more sense to me, given my current understandings, I can admit that.
I will also state, I do not believe the ball of gas sun model either, I am more inline with plasma cosmology in that regard.
But most importantly, I am more concerned about the shit on the ground, the liars and the criminals get all the attention. Once they are dealt with, I would be willing to spend more time with this.
This is the type of assumption you want to start with:
You have no respect peabrain. If you recollect what I said is that your inputs are assumptions, how does this not result in the understanding you cannot correctly perform the calculation as your inputs are estimates.
I may return to read the rest later.