Look at pangea and continental drift though. If the earth were inflating like a basketball, it would make the same thing happen. Stars expand. The earth is made of stardust, right? And allegedly oil is biodegraded waste right? And lava flows and cools as it expands, no?
Maybe It would be a slow creep, like a few inches every few hundred years.
Are you off your coked up head? Star dust? What are you on. You're insane. The purpose of these videos are they appeal to dumb people. We aren't a star, the Sun. We are a planet.
We lost continents because our sea level is much higher today than when we were a Pangea. When all those continents fit together. We have lost land since recording it. We haven't gained land, unless we've reclaimed it from the sea. Okay even in the last ice-age or within the last 100k years New Zealand is much smaller. And others.
With the current rift in Africa the tectonic plates moving, that freaking basketball deflating, or whatever nonsense you're citing. When it breaks off, have we globally gained or lost land?
Look at the continental shelf. Have we gained or lost land?
God damn retards. Study something. Anything except this.
Is there anybody else so freaking gone. Literally gone on hippy new age drugs. Egomaniacs.
We are on a planet called Earth and it is not a Star. Stardust. We need the Sun to live, like everything does. But we don't contain Stardust.
That link is nothing but conjecture. It is hypothetical. Completely irate. If and if then if, makes speculation. Stardust sends sparkles everywhere. The Big Bang hasn't been proved either. It's hypothetical, and an assumption. There are plenty of other theories on it. I am quite sure when the Sun goes nova. It kills off life. Creating the wormholes. Life literally cannot sustain without the Sun. If that's your connection to it. But in a remarkable reverse, a big bang, all of a sudden out of the blue, you're full of sparkles. God damn it. It makes nonsense. One kills life. But the other nova caused it. Tedious. Hyperbole. No accuracy, and in another few millennia when they actually get there, they'll look back on their silly theories and laugh.
Your ignorance. You have said nothing. You have failed to rationally produce any actual argument. I did. You're just dumb. But everybody else is to blame because you're dumb. Yet you haven't said anything rational.
Read it. You dumb retard. Read what you wrote. It's peak autism. You make no argument, suddenly I am dumb? On what planet?
I will destroy your other post as well. It is as autistic. You don't understand simple geography.
Um no. Growing earth. Hahaha.
So like your country would gain mileage. You can test this in America by driving end to fucking end.
More people undoubtedly. Dumber people absolutely.
Look at pangea and continental drift though. If the earth were inflating like a basketball, it would make the same thing happen. Stars expand. The earth is made of stardust, right? And allegedly oil is biodegraded waste right? And lava flows and cools as it expands, no? Maybe It would be a slow creep, like a few inches every few hundred years.
He has a lot of videos that show evidence that all celestial body are growing. It's a pretty cool channel.
Sadly, he died in May. 80 years old, so I guess he had a good run.
Are you off your coked up head? Star dust? What are you on. You're insane. The purpose of these videos are they appeal to dumb people. We aren't a star, the Sun. We are a planet.
We lost continents because our sea level is much higher today than when we were a Pangea. When all those continents fit together. We have lost land since recording it. We haven't gained land, unless we've reclaimed it from the sea. Okay even in the last ice-age or within the last 100k years New Zealand is much smaller. And others.
With the current rift in Africa the tectonic plates moving, that freaking basketball deflating, or whatever nonsense you're citing. When it breaks off, have we globally gained or lost land?
Look at the continental shelf. Have we gained or lost land?
God damn retards. Study something. Anything except this.
You don’t read much, do you, mate?
https://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/are-we-really-made-of-stardust.html
Haha, are we made of cocaine. You crackhead.
We are made of carbon.
Is there anybody else so freaking gone. Literally gone on hippy new age drugs. Egomaniacs.
We are on a planet called Earth and it is not a Star. Stardust. We need the Sun to live, like everything does. But we don't contain Stardust.
That link is nothing but conjecture. It is hypothetical. Completely irate. If and if then if, makes speculation. Stardust sends sparkles everywhere. The Big Bang hasn't been proved either. It's hypothetical, and an assumption. There are plenty of other theories on it. I am quite sure when the Sun goes nova. It kills off life. Creating the wormholes. Life literally cannot sustain without the Sun. If that's your connection to it. But in a remarkable reverse, a big bang, all of a sudden out of the blue, you're full of sparkles. God damn it. It makes nonsense. One kills life. But the other nova caused it. Tedious. Hyperbole. No accuracy, and in another few millennia when they actually get there, they'll look back on their silly theories and laugh.
You should stop posting on this topic. Your ignorance is embarrassing.
Your ignorance. You have said nothing. You have failed to rationally produce any actual argument. I did. You're just dumb. But everybody else is to blame because you're dumb. Yet you haven't said anything rational.
Read it. You dumb retard. Read what you wrote. It's peak autism. You make no argument, suddenly I am dumb? On what planet?
I will destroy your other post as well. It is as autistic. You don't understand simple geography.
Right back at you, princess.