I'm not sure what the plants and stars are. But planets are not reflecting the sun's light. Stars are not light-years away. They are all pretty dang close and small. Almost nothing nasa shows you is real.
Stars are definitely not far away. That's all I know for sure. I think Earth, the moon, and other plants are spheres. I can view them with my own telescope and observe that they rotate. The moon is shaded exactly like a sphere in a beam of light would be. You can see the directional shadows on the crater walls.
There is a big secret being kept regarding the cosmos, but personally, I don't think it's the shape.
I've seen amateur astronomers view "planets" and they appear to be light pulsing and fluctuating in size, shape, and speed. Very different from the "professional" astronomers that use computer programs with their telescopes. I believe those programs deceive the observer by displaying artificial images of planets ( images that are spoon fed on TV, internet, NASA, etc) and not the actual view of the telescope. Gonna post link
The globetards like to push the current theory supported by occult institutions. Lol... What if both trains of thought are wrong and we are all duped? In the end (revelation 6:14) the sky will recede like a scroll.
Planets are not rocks or gas balls that reflect light. They are luminaries just like stars, that's why the ancients called them wandering stars. And stars are not light-years away.
They absolutely do not "emit" even more light than the moon. This is extremely apparent when you have a new moon: the planets aren't casting shadow at night..
Stars are very far away so the amount of light coming to the earth is low.
Reflected light from planets is significantly closer and denser.
Our atmosphere is filled with "molecules" and with the weaker light from stars, they flicker bcz of the interference with these "molecules" while planets reflecting light emit enough to pass thru, appearing solid light.
I'm not a scientist or anything... However, can't trust the scientific explanation. Can't believe the festering freemasonic, occult, satanist cabaal that spoon feeds the population what they should know as "fact" or "the current thing"
Well ayh am NOT part of any cabal (wish ayh was) and having actually ran experiments and knowing the physics of it.. do not know how to help you other than, stop worshiping the notions of religions with religious competition.
No problem. I agree to disagree. Interesting to see people showing the curvature of earth with fisheye lenses. Makes it look concave and convex. Anyways, the current scientific explanation is that what we can observe came from nothing ("big bang"), humans eventually evolved from the elements that spawned from the bang over billions of years, and we are on a spinning spheroid hurling through "space". Seems legit... Jk it's a fabrication of reality to me. There may be some tidbits of truth and deception in the current narrative. And there may be tidbits left out entirely.
And before there was our observable reality, there was a hot ball of something that blew up. Where did this thing come from and was there nothing there before it?
you know you can change the lens, right? and in the era of (((starlink))) you could just simply make it stream the video, so if it's lost then you just lost the equipment, not the recording.
as I've heard a couple of flattards are rich bitches, you could suggest them this method.
Can one change lenses to a non fisheye one? And one would need a capable balloon (weather balloon?) and strong broadcasting equipment to send video signal to "satellites" to have video feed/location tracking. On top of that, one would probably need clearance to be in the airspace and proper simulations to make sure it doesn't land in a populated area. And at that point, why not CGI some shit in too ( special interest groups keeping the narrative going)? Lol
Apparently, many people agree with the satanic occult masonic cabal. Hope you people have a breakthrough and wake up to the deception. Remember, the science is not the be all end all. All scientists agree because the dissenters are discredited, denounced, or outright silenced (killed). Hope that gives you a big hint.
You do realize the planets are exponentially closer to us than the nearest star, right?
Where are the flat earth theorists?
Interested in them chiming in
I'm not sure what the plants and stars are. But planets are not reflecting the sun's light. Stars are not light-years away. They are all pretty dang close and small. Almost nothing nasa shows you is real.
https://youtu.be/LdyV-FtLT70
Stars are definitely not far away. That's all I know for sure. I think Earth, the moon, and other plants are spheres. I can view them with my own telescope and observe that they rotate. The moon is shaded exactly like a sphere in a beam of light would be. You can see the directional shadows on the crater walls.
There is a big secret being kept regarding the cosmos, but personally, I don't think it's the shape.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTosRKKQ-Ng
I've seen amateur astronomers view "planets" and they appear to be light pulsing and fluctuating in size, shape, and speed. Very different from the "professional" astronomers that use computer programs with their telescopes. I believe those programs deceive the observer by displaying artificial images of planets ( images that are spoon fed on TV, internet, NASA, etc) and not the actual view of the telescope. Gonna post link
that flattard channel is so much for the (((truth))) they disabled the comments! 😂😂😂
The globetards like to push the current theory supported by occult institutions. Lol... What if both trains of thought are wrong and we are all duped? In the end (revelation 6:14) the sky will recede like a scroll.
you know that "circle" is a mistranslation, right? the original texts say sphere!
https://knowledgeofancients.blogspot.com/2018/04/the-knowledge-of-ancients.html
Which language are you referring to?
Hebrew.
In case you didn't know, part of the Bible was originally written in that.
Albedo.
rubedo
nigredo
ora et labora, frater
Planets are not rocks or gas balls that reflect light. They are luminaries just like stars, that's why the ancients called them wandering stars. And stars are not light-years away.
https://youtu.be/LdyV-FtLT70
Please stop attempting to do Science without any instruments.
It is called a light meter, try and get one.
Are visible observations not part of science?
Stop asking dumb questions and trying to mislead people.
Your rhetoric doesn’t defeat the fact that some tools exist make measurements that are more accurate than naked eye observations.
I’m sure there’s an answer to your question somewhere out there on the Internet.
Its a distance thing.
I'm not a scientist or anything... However, can't trust the scientific explanation. Can't believe the festering freemasonic, occult, satanist cabaal that spoon feeds the population what they should know as "fact" or "the current thing"
Well ayh am NOT part of any cabal (wish ayh was) and having actually ran experiments and knowing the physics of it.. do not know how to help you other than, stop worshiping the notions of religions with religious competition.
No problem. I agree to disagree. Interesting to see people showing the curvature of earth with fisheye lenses. Makes it look concave and convex. Anyways, the current scientific explanation is that what we can observe came from nothing ("big bang"), humans eventually evolved from the elements that spawned from the bang over billions of years, and we are on a spinning spheroid hurling through "space". Seems legit... Jk it's a fabrication of reality to me. There may be some tidbits of truth and deception in the current narrative. And there may be tidbits left out entirely.
I am totally wrong? What do they believe in then?
And before there was our observable reality, there was a hot ball of something that blew up. Where did this thing come from and was there nothing there before it?
how come none of you flattards have ever let up a gopro balloon with the camera pointing downwards?
Aside from cost and need for location tracking, the fisheye lense distortion makes straight lines look curved and vice versa
you know you can change the lens, right? and in the era of (((starlink))) you could just simply make it stream the video, so if it's lost then you just lost the equipment, not the recording.
as I've heard a couple of flattards are rich bitches, you could suggest them this method.
Can one change lenses to a non fisheye one? And one would need a capable balloon (weather balloon?) and strong broadcasting equipment to send video signal to "satellites" to have video feed/location tracking. On top of that, one would probably need clearance to be in the airspace and proper simulations to make sure it doesn't land in a populated area. And at that point, why not CGI some shit in too ( special interest groups keeping the narrative going)? Lol
Apparently, many people agree with the satanic occult masonic cabal. Hope you people have a breakthrough and wake up to the deception. Remember, the science is not the be all end all. All scientists agree because the dissenters are discredited, denounced, or outright silenced (killed). Hope that gives you a big hint.
This is what I guess is the mainstream answer
Why Do Some Stars And Planets Appear Brighter Than Others? https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=HCebY0E4FZw
GENESIS 1:14 - 18. They are lights. Modern scientific explanation is deceiving
https://knowledgeofancients.blogspot.com/2018/04/the-knowledge-of-ancients.html
In my view, and the view of our ancestors, the planets are actually planets. It is earth which isn’t.
Planets are stars which move differently than the other stars (“wandering stars”). Earth is terra firma, and not a star (aka light in the sky).
The rodenberrian “planet” is an invention of fiction majorly popularized through television.