You know, it's not just that Leftists are not consistent, and it's not that they're hypocritical, and it's not even that they fail to ever acknowledge their hypocrisy or to modify their position when it's pointed out. I think they actually lack the capacity to detect self-contradiction.
From what I theorize, they begin with the conclusion and reason "backwards" to the premises. You can see that in this situation, there's no opportunity for their conclusion to be found to be contradictory to any other, as it was already determined to be true at the initiation.
I don't think this is a moral failing, either, but rather a functional difference. I have no sympathy for their opinions and little sympathy for them, but I've often thought it's not productive to just write them off as moronic a-holes.
You know, it's not just that Leftists are not consistent, and it's not that they're hypocritical, and it's not even that they fail to ever acknowledge their hypocrisy or to modify their position when it's pointed out. I think they actually lack the capacity to detect self-contradiction.
From what I theorize, they begin with the conclusion and reason "backwards" to the premises. You can see that in this situation, there's no opportunity for their conclusion to be found to be contradictory to any other, as it was already determined to be true at the initiation.
I don't think this is a moral failing, either, but rather a functional difference. I have no sympathy for their opinions and little sympathy for them, but I've often thought it's not productive to just write them off as moronic a-holes.
> lack the capacity to detect self-contradiction
those people left "the left" when $hillary was coronated in '16.
They either know they are hypocrites, but don't care.
Or they lack the ability to even recognize the inconsistency in their logic.
Either way they deserve to be impaled since a healthy civilization cannot prosper if they are left alive.
When did you first reach this conclusion?