Artemis I Fakery
(www.msn.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (53)
sorted by:
It’s common to want to hang onto the comforting lie rather than confront the unpleasant truth
“Earth is not flat”
“Space is real”
“We went to the moon”
“Just get outta here”
Is someone else on your account right now? You’re usually better than this
Honestly, I thought you were awake to a lot of the shit but just hadn’t given the flat earth subject the attention (I feel) it deserves
Now I just get the impression that I’m not even talking to the same TS
For the simple fact that humans lack faith and have to see it to believe it they sure believe the space lie without ever experiencing a trip to the moon. Nathan Oakley in Flat Earth Debate has good questions that no one can seems to answer. What is the r value from the surface of the earth since they always use the r value from the center of the earth stating there is a measurable curve. True distance to the sun since triangles dont have curves you cant use angular measurements to determine distance. Proof of gas pressure and vacuum without a container.
Shoot yourselves. We’re not doing this same jewish song and dance every fucking day.
Thanks for admitting that you believe Africa isn’t real.
Great job aligning yourself with jew worshippers and subsapient NPCs.
I’ve seen your copy and paste list of disingenuous questions before
It seems like you think it’s some sort a mic drop
I might take the time to respond in detail over the weekend but I doubt you’d earnestly consider the responses
You didn’t even comment on the Artemis link shared that opened this thread
Care to comment on NASAs Artemis video in the link?
Why does the moon get to ignore light? Where are the stars?
Learn how a digital camera works, paid shill.
Care to comment on the link? Artemis video? All good two thumbs up?
I have so many other better things to do than waste my time responding to your disingenuous questions
You won’t care to consider them because if you cared to look into it, we wouldn’t be having this conversation
I don’t know if you took the jab or something but either your mental faculties are in decline, fren, or you just aren’t even the same person managing the account
I guess you would have to take an angular measurement from a star above head to the horizon from opposite directions and then some how determine a radius value from that measurement to determine earth bulge, but the radius value given is always from a presupposed earth core, and a bias that the earth is a globe. You would have to transform your measurement onto a sphere shape of x. The value of x just has to be bigger than the measured distance by a great magnitude so that it is believable. Do my calculations below. Or you can look at the pyramids and play with numbers like most mathematicians did when playing in the sand to prove the earth is a sphere. From the book quadrivium pg. 32 based on sacred numbers Elevenses measure and the moon Eleven is a mysterious underworldly number-in german it goes by the appropriate name of Elf. Eleven is important as the first number that allows us to begin to comprehend the measure of a circle. This is because, for practical purposes, a circle measuring 7 across will measure eleven half way across. This relationship between eleven and seven was considered so profound by the ancient egyptians that they used it as the basis for the design of the great pyramid. A circle drawn around the elevation of the great pyramid has the same perimeter as that of its square base. The intended seven-elevenfold conversion between square and curve is demonstrated by numerous surveys. The ancients were obsessed with measures, and the number eleven is central in their metrological scheme. The size of the moon relates to the size of the earth as does three to eleven. This link paints the picture http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-6O8JypmB1Yk/Vf2EnOqpILI/AAAAAAAATWo/JCxQYHXn0HQ/s1600/150919%2BSquaring%2BThe%2BCircle.jpg What this means is that if we draw down the moon (3) to the earth (11) as shown, then the heavenly circle through the moon will have a circumference equal to the perimeter of a square around the earth. This is called ‘squaring the circle.’ Quite how old druids (mystic arts) worked this out we may never know, but they clearly did, for the moon and the earth are best measured in miles. Eleven, seven, and three are all Lucas numbers, sisters of the fibonacci numbers, new numbers forming from the sum of the previous two numbers. The fibonacci sequence (seen in nature and probably the result of god) begins 1,1,2,3,5,8, whereas the Lucas numbers begins 2,1,3,4,7,11. (Coming from sacred numbers and possibly mystical teachings.) Do the following math and check it with wikipedia and the link above. Moon diameter (miles) = 3 x 1x2x3x4x5x6 Moon diameter (miles) = 3 x 8x9x10 Earth diameter (miles) = 11 x 1x2x3x4x5x6 Earth diameter (miles) = 11 x 8x9x9 Moon radius + earth radius (miles) = 1x2x3x4x5x6x7 Moon radius + earth radius (miles) = 7x8x9x10 Area of heavenly circle (square miles) = 2 x 1x2x3x4x5x6x7x8x9x10x11 Do the math. These calculations alone will give you what wikipedia tells you are the real numbers. Dont need that dude in alexandria measuring shadows from an obelisk to do this one. With these numbers obelisk dude could make the math work since he probably knew the calculations and wasnt in syene at noon he was in alexandria some 500 miles away and there is no way a second observer in syene could relay the time for him to start measuring. They played with numbers. The numbers are so big as it relates to a sphere they were able to fool everyone. This still doesnt explain how you would obtain a radius from angular measurements on the surface which is what you would do to prove the earth is a globe not squaring a circle.