As the time nears for the cosmic catastrophe, whether it is through cosmic impactors or a solar event, one thing is certain the preparation for informational damage control to keep the serf population in check will be top priority.
For the vast masses of ignorant a simple bread and circus is enough, so hypersexuality to keep them intellectually deflated is enough.
For those that raised one standard deviation above that, the institutions of academia and the scientific propaganda are the structures of control that keep them in check. By overwhelming their capable (but not so much) intellect with citations, authority based on perceived scientific respectability (which is nothing more than rewards for those who right-think) they cannot escape the worldview.
To reject that worldview would be to be irrational, right?! How can I reject science?! It's what gives me smartphones and porn and shit! It's what made every human healthy! I cannot, to try to go beyond it is simply conspiracy theory lunacy! Me, the rational one, with the armor of academia and the scientific community, arrived at truth!
This is the modus cogitandi of these people, on the surface their emerging intellect seems like a bonus, but the mediocrity of it makes them even more susceptible to interference from the cultural engineers.
So, after that we find a new paradigm, a paradigm of direct cognition that transcends even rationality. This is how Srinivasa Ramanujan could devise incredible equations that baffled the british and when inquired he just responded: "my family goddess gave me those equations in a vision".
Intellect is but a reflection of spiritual sight and the more we purify ourselves the more we become conduits for this divine knowledge. Our minds reflect, to think that we create is vanity. So, in this sense, it is the purest mirror that reflects the most light.
So how does everything that I just said ties to Graham Hancock's current show on internet's favorite propaganda vehicle? It works in an even more subvertive way. It tries to pretend to transcend the mediocre intellectual worldview when in actuality being another trap.
He rants about how academia dismisses certain obvious hints because they are incompatible with their worldview but when presented with cross-cultural uniform statements such as: "the beings who built the pyramids were giants" he instantly dismisses it:
of course not giants, what bafoonery, right? they recorded astronomical events, protected from global cataclysms but when they say they are giants, it's just figure of speech, ha ha, serf, you almost believed in ancient scripture, right? but papa hancock is here to show you the real truth, right here... on netflix
We are nearing a moment where every ancient scripture is being vindicated. At this time, look at your own heart, visions, experience and traditions, for propaganda, even seemingly freeing ones, are going to be subtle shackles for our minds.
What do you see as disinformation on EUT?
The picture became clear for me only in hindsight. The insights EU brings came to me as startling revelations, and inevitably I was inclined to believe everything they said. Of course, that's precisely the point, isn't it?
When I learned for myself who the ancient "gods" were, I listened more intently and alertly to what the EU interpretation was. I could see that there was no mention whatsoever of any idea other than that all ancient mythology was a "novelization" of natural events. Were one to adopt this paradigm, they would never properly interpret any of the evidence I had uncovered. I came to realize, again, that's precisely the point, isn't it?
Later on, I came across this paper, raising more questions but from a completely different angle:
Is the Electric Universe Controlled Opposition? (8-page PDF 5/1/2018)
You can evaluate his objections and issues independently, but we have now waded into very deep waters: Mathis is himself disinfo! One of the highest levels of which I know.
So here, Mathis is trying to put you off EU and muddy the waters, because EU itself makes many revelations that "They" would rather not have had to give you. You can see how difficult it is to discern the truth in such an environment but, again, that's precisely the point, isn't it?
Jon Levi I've heard of but not familiar with. As far as Suspicious Observers, it's really dredging it out from a long time ago but as far as I can recall I think I thought they had some interesting topics, then when I finally got around to listening I thought, "Oh okay, there's a lot of nonsense in here, probable disinfo, moving on."
That's another basic disinfo technique to keep you away from the truth: just flood the zone with half-truths and intriguing tales and dead ends. It's as effective as telling you a carefully constructed lie.
So whoever you're listening to, pay extremely close attention when they talk about anything you have a solid background in. If they make even minor mistakes you must ask the question, "Is that the kind of error or oversight any of us could make, or did they just tip their hand?" They can deceive as easily as they do because only a handful are actively looking for those tipped hands.