As the time nears for the cosmic catastrophe, whether it is through cosmic impactors or a solar event, one thing is certain the preparation for informational damage control to keep the serf population in check will be top priority.
For the vast masses of ignorant a simple bread and circus is enough, so hypersexuality to keep them intellectually deflated is enough.
For those that raised one standard deviation above that, the institutions of academia and the scientific propaganda are the structures of control that keep them in check. By overwhelming their capable (but not so much) intellect with citations, authority based on perceived scientific respectability (which is nothing more than rewards for those who right-think) they cannot escape the worldview.
To reject that worldview would be to be irrational, right?! How can I reject science?! It's what gives me smartphones and porn and shit! It's what made every human healthy! I cannot, to try to go beyond it is simply conspiracy theory lunacy! Me, the rational one, with the armor of academia and the scientific community, arrived at truth!
This is the modus cogitandi of these people, on the surface their emerging intellect seems like a bonus, but the mediocrity of it makes them even more susceptible to interference from the cultural engineers.
So, after that we find a new paradigm, a paradigm of direct cognition that transcends even rationality. This is how Srinivasa Ramanujan could devise incredible equations that baffled the british and when inquired he just responded: "my family goddess gave me those equations in a vision".
Intellect is but a reflection of spiritual sight and the more we purify ourselves the more we become conduits for this divine knowledge. Our minds reflect, to think that we create is vanity. So, in this sense, it is the purest mirror that reflects the most light.
So how does everything that I just said ties to Graham Hancock's current show on internet's favorite propaganda vehicle? It works in an even more subvertive way. It tries to pretend to transcend the mediocre intellectual worldview when in actuality being another trap.
He rants about how academia dismisses certain obvious hints because they are incompatible with their worldview but when presented with cross-cultural uniform statements such as: "the beings who built the pyramids were giants" he instantly dismisses it:
of course not giants, what bafoonery, right? they recorded astronomical events, protected from global cataclysms but when they say they are giants, it's just figure of speech, ha ha, serf, you almost believed in ancient scripture, right? but papa hancock is here to show you the real truth, right here... on netflix
We are nearing a moment where every ancient scripture is being vindicated. At this time, look at your own heart, visions, experience and traditions, for propaganda, even seemingly freeing ones, are going to be subtle shackles for our minds.
Yeah, I'm definitely a subscriber to the polar alignment/"purple dawn" hypothesis. I have my radar on for evidence of it as it comes by, but there's very little.
Wish I could find the link, but for me the last piece dropped into place recently. There's some sort of rare stellar structure that is basically huge blobs of gas strung out like pearls in a line. My guess is that it's rare because it's short-lived. It explains simultaneously the very weird polar alignment and also how most star systems are binary or trinary.
If Purple Dawn is correct, then it was within human memory, and for certain reasons I would put that no more than 50K years ago. That really upends a lot of what we've been told about, well, a lot.
But my point in all this is that "They" have really been pushed to tell us a lot of truth lately, and I take that as a very positive sign.
Have you tried correlating with the Greek thema mundi?
No, that's a new one on me. I couldn't say a word about it, but from a quick look I would say the approach I take is in quite the opposite direction, although not necessarily opposed as I hope you will see.
To illustrate, I found this sentence:
That seems to me to be quite a complex thing to unwind and fully understand. What I've found is that there is a wealth of quite simple and straightforward evidence lying around in plain sight, but the real problem is that it has been overlooked or misinterpreted or some thin lie has been told about it by the "experts". For me, all this "low hanging fruit" should be harvested before taking on anything more uncertain.
As a finer point touching on astrology and the planets, it looks to me as if they were simply named in honor of the most prominent "gods" (who were/are real beings present on the Earth). That is, in the data concerning these "gods", I haven't found any evidence of any type of "mystical" association.
As an analogy, the local sports stadium is named "AT&T Park". That's not because there's a divine relation between that ground and the corporate overlord, or even that it honors and reveres that entity. It's as simple as that AT&T signed a contract and gave them money.