It is infantile to pretend that the US is still representative republic. Jewish billionaires have bought the White House, Congress, and the MSM to create overt semitic oligarchy. Rothschild's face might as well be on the $50 bill.
Having said that, this was their opportunity to demonstrate that their way was a better way and they've blew it. In the last 2years we've seen:
- Weaponized federal law enforcement used to attack the jews' critics
- The jewish-controlled CDC, MSM and pharmaceutical industry work in lockstep to manufacture a "pandemic" from a virus with a mortality rate < 1%.
- The jewish-controlled CDC, MSM and pharmaceutical industry work in lockstep to apply extreme duress to mandate the toxic "vaccine."
- Jewish organized and funded national election fraud
- Weaponization of the banking and judicial system to bankrupt opponents of jewish supremacy
- The Epstein child prostitution/blackmail scam remain unprosecuted
- The government and MSM push gender mutilation for children
- The monopolization of social media to implement unprecedented censorship designed to prevent the exposure of jewish criminality.
- The weaponization of illegal immigration to dilute the white middle class and weaken them economically
- A propaganda campaign to ignore basic genetics to pretend that the mentally ill can wish their gender away.
- The normalization of pedophilia and grooming by homosexuals
- Open looting of the US Treasury and financial markets. All of the "Ukraine aid" is going into somebody's wallet.
- The weaponization of blacks to attack whites and white institutions. Hindsight makes it obvious that the only reason that the jews championed the Civil Rights movement was to create the urban, welfare-slavery state.
- The use of the US military to destroy Israel's enemies. American soldiers were killed and maimed in the Middle East solely for jewish conquest.
- The open bribery of our "representatives" in both parties to only represent the jewish supremacy agenda.
This is what permanent and overt jewish oligarchy looks like: Institutalized criminality.
This represents the commonwealth (process of dying); this represents the partial evaluation thereof (living). Now let's add AFFA'IR, noun [Latin facere. The primary sense of facio is to urge, drive, impel.] - "business of any kind; that which is done, or is to be done" aka that which is done (enacting process of dying) and that which is to be done (living reaction).
Which brings me to "representative government"...reaction of living by free will of choice represents the representative control (govern) of mind (ment) within the enacting process of dying. Each one of the many represents "representative government"; which each one ignores when consenting to the suggested "representative government" by the few "chosen ones" aka the ELITE (French élite) - "selection, choice".
The process of dying represents the impressing force upon mind (loss); living represents the expressing force of mind (growth), and it's the process of dying which represents the perceivable laws of nature for those perceiving it from within.
a) what if what is being criticized represents the reaction among the few to the ignorant behavior of the many? What if ignorance among the many shapes IN'SOLENCE, noun [Latin insolentia; in and soleo, to be accustomed.] - "pride or haughtiness manifested in contemptuous and overbearing treatment of others; petulant contempt; impudence" among the few?
What if the resulting conflict both gives the many a justification to remain ignorant by blaming others; while also feeding the insolence of the few with endless more ignorance, hence making them stronger and stronger; while weakening self?
b) CRITIC, noun - "a judge or discerner, to judge, to separate, to distinguish". What if everyone already was separated (from whole process of dying into each one living partial), and what if distinguishing self (apartheid) requires self discernment, not the judgement of others?
Sleight of hand: "everyone's a critic", which is being suggested by the few under the umbrella of "sarcasm" aka as a taunt to tempt ignorance of self by blaming others for being taunted.
If drama (process of dying); then comedy (living)...
What if free will of choice represents the only weapon (of choice)?
RE (response to) PRESENT (presented) aka perceiving (living) responding to perceivable (process of dying). Each one has to represent self, others exploit the ignorance thereof by suggesting representation, which when consented to allows them to react "in the name of" ones free will of choice.
a) what if the living represent the INSTITUTE (Latin instituo; in and statuo) - "to be set within" inside the process of dying aka within natural law?
b) what if one cannot commit a CRIME, noun - " to separate, to judge, to decree, to condemn" perceivable natural law without ignoring it for the suggested laws of men (rules of behavior suggested by others for domestication of free will)?
c) what if the consent of the many to suggested "law" gives the few the power to judge "crime"? If 8 billion other ones tell one "thou shall not kill", then one still represents the free will of choice to kill under natural law.
The process of dying (temptation) requires the living (resistance) to have free will of choice as to be able to adapt by resistance to temptation. The parasitic few utilize mass suggestion of rules to tempt each one of the many to consent to self domestication aka to ignore being choice within perceivable for submitting to the suggested choices of others.
If each one of the many ignores being free will of choice; then the few become the chosen ones aka the OL'IGRACHY, noun [Gr. few, and rule].