Putin on the West
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (17)
sorted by:
lol, come on, you are not so deluded are you?
Russia clearly not pushing the wef khazarian agenda, anyone who suggests he is, is wrong.
Only the west is pushing for khazarian zionism.
a) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Autonomous_Oblast#/media/File:Flag_of_the_Jewish_Autonomous_Oblast.svg
b) who distributes the pusher? Who owns the distribution?
c) if left vs right is fake as fuck; why would east vs west be real? And if the latter is fake as well; what about right vs wrong? Can nature be wrong?
d) any suggested agenda tempts one to ignore being regent (living) within agent (process of dying). It's all about tempting ignorance while distracting from adherence aka push-pull supply chain.
e) why rebuild khazaria when they tricked the many to give them the world without any noticeable resistance? Would rebranding USA into USI change much for those within?
a) officially established in 1934.
b) khazarians
c) Left vs Right is not fake, how it is displayed in media/government can be faked but the division exists
d) There is always an agenda, in the form of goals to achieve, regardless of who else no existence is required.
e) There is no 'global' control, just pockets of control that are facing constant strain. The desire for Khazaria is to fulfill goals laid long ago, and given the existence is goal oriented there is no changing that without significant reduction.
a) right in-between China and Russia...with a flag representing noahide (universal moralism) under the banner of abrahamism. The -isms aside (choice to choice contract law), there's universal (whole) aka UNI (one aka partial) + VERSOR (turn oneself constantly), which implies the ignorance of being partial (living) within whole (process of dying).
b) ESTAB'LISH, verb [Latin stabilio; Heb. to set, fix, establish] - "to set and fix firmly or unalterably; to settle permanently"...this represents "e pluribus unum" (out of many; one" aka suggested togetherness as the inversion of perceivable apartheid (being partial within whole).
Free will of choice represents the tool to alter ones temporary settlement within ongoing balance...and that very choice is being tempted with ignorance by consenting to the suggested word "establish". How? Consenting to suggested "establish" tempts one to believe that those suggesting it can "establish" (affix) anything within the perceivable (moving) system. They can't; but you wield the choice to ignore perceivable for suggested, and so you can fuck yourself over with ignorance; while others exploit that with suggestion.
IDEN'TITY, noun -"sameness" represents the suggested inversion of apartheid aka being partial (living) within whole (process of dying) aka form (life) within flow (inception towards death) aka choice within balance aka perceiving within perceivable aka potential within potentiality aka reaction within enacting and so on.
The few masquerade themselves under the suggested identities the many consented to (identitarianism aka identity politics), which allows them to stack identities, hence becoming the men of many faces, the shapeshifters, the karma chameleons etc.
Yet; while displaying identity (sameness) a sleight of hand is used "the chosen ones" , which implies being different than all the other ones aka the many being suggested to merge together under the umbrella of unity (oneness).
In short...you are being tempted to ignore oneself for suggested sameness (identity) among other "ones". What you really ignore represents being one (living) within oneness (process of dying) aka a different partial within the same whole. Ignorance restricts ones growth of comprehension within perceivable (oneness).
a) choosing to take a step to the left implies coming from the right and vice versa. There's no left vs right (imbalance)...only oneself at the center (choice) of balance (left/right). Ones choice to ignore balance (perceivable) for imbalance (suggested) sets the conflict (reason) into ones memory.
b) as for division...SEX, noun [Latin sexus; seco, to divide.] - "the distinction between male and female". Whole (process of dying) divides into partial (living) through momentum (balance)...that ain't a conflict, but the coexistence of resistance (reaction) within temptation (enacting) aka growth (living) within loss (process of dying).
c) MEDIA (Latin medius; middle) represents suggestion as the parasitic vector in-between perceiving one and perceivable oneness, hence aiming at choice to ignore perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction).
If the few suggest "abortion" then that represents temptation to the many, yet if each one of the many consents to want (pro-choice) or not want (pro-life) suggested (to abort); while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable (to sustain living by resisting the temptation of dying), then the many are not just falling for temptation; shaping the want vs not want conflict of reason and giving the few the power to define; redefine and contradict suggested "abortion", but they also corrupt themselves with ignorance, hence lacking comprehension about what they're doing.
a) form (life) represents the temporary reaction within flow (inception towards death) aka within the ongoing; enacting system.
b) the process of dying represents the agent of always; those living within represent the regents of momentum, hence temporary struggling to sustain self.
c) the few suggest progressivism (wanted outcome) to tempt the many to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable origin. Inception predefines the outcome for life as death. It only requires a little bit of self discernment to comprehend that and to therefore resist the temptation of dying.
The merchants of temptation use any sales-pitch imaginable to tempt the many to ignore resisting the process of dying, hence tempting them to follow suggested orders, instead of resisting the natural order. Why? Because lack of resistance implies growth of opportunity to exploit, which is how a few can exploit a many without much resistance.
This (process of dying) controls that (living) aka an impressing force meeting a resisting force within momentum. The resulting STRAIN (stretch) represents the opportunity for temporary growth (living) within ongoing loss (process of dying).
This represents the foundation of what the many ignore, and what the few distract from by suggesting them to seek control by submitting to suggested systems, which represents the inversion of being the center (choice) of control (balance).
They few make the suggestions (want) that tempt the many to ignore perceivable (need) for. Desire represents the temptation to willingly shirk response-ability (choice) within perceivable (balance) for submission to the suggestions (imbalance) of others.
If one desires (want or not want) what others suggest; then one ignores that nature already offers everything needed for the living to sustain themselves within the process of dying.
The ongoing process of dying represents constant change and the loss of all growth living within. The few suggest signs (idols of meaning) to tempt the many to repress (loss) expression (growth), and the consent of the many to the suggestions of the few buries them under self inflicted depression, because of all the idols of meaning (suggested information) they willingly uphold mentally; while reasoning against each other over it.
The partial can never consume what the whole has to offer; only waste resistance into the temptation of wanting to accumulate more and more and more...entrance merchant of temptation.
Fulfillment implies filling the mind (memory) up within suggested information; which ignores that the mind exists within perceivable inspiration, hence as a tool for temporary adaptation to constant inspiration. The struggle to resist (living) temptation (dying) requires inspiration and so everything moving represents inspiration to resist; while the motion itself represents temptation to hold onto, to go with the flow; to follow the mainstream; to adhere to the party-line, to march within the chain of command; to follow orders; to seek achievement in goals; to be progressive etc.
If you wanted to argue your point, you might bring up the fact that Jews allowed Hillary Clinton to approve the sale of billions of dollars worth of nuclear uranium to Russia not so long ago.
a) need (perceivable) over want (suggested)
b) to argue about suggested (want vs not want) tempts one to ignore adapting to perceivable (need/want), hence balancing in-between.
c) a point implies the end of a sentence; which tempts one to ignore that live is being sent from inception towards death; hence in need to resist the temptation to go with the flow towards the end.
Living (reacting) within the process of dying (enacting) implies the choice to remake and redo, while in the process of being made and done by.
The few suggest the many to believe in facts as to tempt them to ignore the ongoing system underneath, which will dissolve all their precious facts over and over again.
a) process of dying (all value) to living (each ones evaluation thereof). Others suggest values (money) to tempt one to ignore to evaluate (perceiving) value (perceivable).
b) DOLLAR; noun (German Taler; from Tal) - Niederung (depression). A suggested inversion of perceivable impression (process of dying) for perceiving expression (living). How does one repress growth within loss? Suggest depression in return for self repression.
Meanwhile a sleight of hand performed by Madonna..."express yourself; don't repress yourself"..."and I'm not sorry; it's human nature"..."I'm not your bitch don't hang your shit on me"..."it's human nature".