It wasn't severely damaged outside of the illusion. An illusion that dented their normality. Larger attacks hitting home occur. 4 months since hitting Kiev. Awhile since some other places hit.
Weapons are immediately being sent to them. Air defenses are immediately going to Kiev. They already have major pledges of weapons on route from France, UK, and America.
I doubt it gives any pause to this conflict.
Meanwhile 3rd party peace ambassadors are enroute to discuss it.
No, it won't have done much else. Ukraine will keep attacking in the way they have.
They knocked out power, sewage, govt buildings, etc. This was a pretty heavy attack in my opinion. Heavy enough that there are some that see peace deals on the horizon. Anyway, I hope peace comes, but it seems, oddly enough, that the only Country that wants peace and has tried is Russia. Go figure.
Heavy sustained until they yield. Not whoosh. 1 hit wonder. Wonder what was that. Set up the next volley. Keep them on edge. I am categorically not saying this as a Russian. I am not, I'm pragmatic. Studied history and read some strategy.
Peace comes when they bow. They won't.
I don't care except there is no peace because both sides want what the other will not give, and there's almost no room for compromise, making it an empty gesture.
Any talks stall peace, any ceasefire arms the enemy. Peace takes even more provoking.
The narrative has dismissed peace with Russia, it has no fuel and cannot ship or fly supplies in, because the bridge is out of commission, and it has no diesel refineries. So charge at them, they will fail. They don't have any more hypersonics and very few cruise left. Seriously laughable. But it's the narrative.
It is strange, here in the West they don't speak of the past votes of the re-acquired and now annexed regions of Ukraine. I looked into it and the vote was the same a decade or two ago (on two occasions) as they are mostly ethnic Russians. And they don't mention the 2014 coup! lol
They don't talk about the verbal assurances made after 91' or so (where a few leaders said NATO would not move East.) They don't mention the killing of 14,000 (?) Russians in Donbass and they are now defending the Nazi's who do the killing there.
And the news won't even mention the Bio-labs (and the UN won't consider it.)
You know, on the one hand this seems like a planned set-up for a large war. I just don't get it outside that. It makes zero sense to push Russia into this war and MANY Westerners see this, but we have almost zero control of our deep state "leaders".
It is a much larger geopolitical war. And it is a conflict that is a serving agenda by driving change. Outside of this it was easily provoked begging the obvious. Did they want to fight Russia directly or simply contain Russia and using that opportunity to enlist sudden change. Look at the market, recession, new emerging technology, renewables, and supposed methods. While at the same time drawing out this conflict and prompting it.
How it plays out. A peace deal must be offered. Otherwise it could escalate into nuclear conflict. But a peace deal is no where in the making and even if there is some temporary peace it could still cause war later. A peace deal presently must recognise Ukraine isn't what it think it is territorially. Otherwise there is war. A peace deal must look to stop all aggression later.
Ukraine could never make that deal. It will arm and fight for its entire territory while it is armed. Russia will not lose the Crimea, or any present oblasts now under its sovereignty.
It was aggressive Nato expansion that caused this conflict, and bad Russian policy losing its own former allies.
It wasn't severely damaged outside of the illusion. An illusion that dented their normality. Larger attacks hitting home occur. 4 months since hitting Kiev. Awhile since some other places hit.
Weapons are immediately being sent to them. Air defenses are immediately going to Kiev. They already have major pledges of weapons on route from France, UK, and America.
I doubt it gives any pause to this conflict.
Meanwhile 3rd party peace ambassadors are enroute to discuss it.
No, it won't have done much else. Ukraine will keep attacking in the way they have.
They knocked out power, sewage, govt buildings, etc. This was a pretty heavy attack in my opinion. Heavy enough that there are some that see peace deals on the horizon. Anyway, I hope peace comes, but it seems, oddly enough, that the only Country that wants peace and has tried is Russia. Go figure.
Heavy sustained until they yield. Not whoosh. 1 hit wonder. Wonder what was that. Set up the next volley. Keep them on edge. I am categorically not saying this as a Russian. I am not, I'm pragmatic. Studied history and read some strategy.
Peace comes when they bow. They won't.
I don't care except there is no peace because both sides want what the other will not give, and there's almost no room for compromise, making it an empty gesture.
Any talks stall peace, any ceasefire arms the enemy. Peace takes even more provoking.
The narrative has dismissed peace with Russia, it has no fuel and cannot ship or fly supplies in, because the bridge is out of commission, and it has no diesel refineries. So charge at them, they will fail. They don't have any more hypersonics and very few cruise left. Seriously laughable. But it's the narrative.
It is strange, here in the West they don't speak of the past votes of the re-acquired and now annexed regions of Ukraine. I looked into it and the vote was the same a decade or two ago (on two occasions) as they are mostly ethnic Russians. And they don't mention the 2014 coup! lol
They don't talk about the verbal assurances made after 91' or so (where a few leaders said NATO would not move East.) They don't mention the killing of 14,000 (?) Russians in Donbass and they are now defending the Nazi's who do the killing there.
And the news won't even mention the Bio-labs (and the UN won't consider it.)
You know, on the one hand this seems like a planned set-up for a large war. I just don't get it outside that. It makes zero sense to push Russia into this war and MANY Westerners see this, but we have almost zero control of our deep state "leaders".
It is a much larger geopolitical war. And it is a conflict that is a serving agenda by driving change. Outside of this it was easily provoked begging the obvious. Did they want to fight Russia directly or simply contain Russia and using that opportunity to enlist sudden change. Look at the market, recession, new emerging technology, renewables, and supposed methods. While at the same time drawing out this conflict and prompting it.
How it plays out. A peace deal must be offered. Otherwise it could escalate into nuclear conflict. But a peace deal is no where in the making and even if there is some temporary peace it could still cause war later. A peace deal presently must recognise Ukraine isn't what it think it is territorially. Otherwise there is war. A peace deal must look to stop all aggression later.
Ukraine could never make that deal. It will arm and fight for its entire territory while it is armed. Russia will not lose the Crimea, or any present oblasts now under its sovereignty.
It was aggressive Nato expansion that caused this conflict, and bad Russian policy losing its own former allies.