a) this (inception towards death) represents the only way for those (life) within.
b) the way doesn't talk; it doesn't suggest information; it doesn't communicate words or writing. It differentiates from whole into partial; it moves differences; it communicates inspiration for adaptation to being moved.
c) PAL'ATABLE, adjective [from palate.] - "agreeable to the taste"...the way (process of dying) requires resistance (hunger) from those (living) within; while tempting (taste) ignorance.
d) it doesn't matter if the living agree (want) or disagree (not want) with the process of dying; since they're forced to adapt (need). If one is directed; then one can only react to being utilized for growth (need) or loss (want); while being temporary (living) within ongoing (process of dying).
The way you talk is so obnoxious.
OBNOX'IOUS, adjective [Latin ob and noxius, hurtful.]...the way (process of dying) represents hurtful for those (living) struggling within to sustain self; yet blissful for those who ignore the struggle. This is why the many willingly choose self destruction (want) over self sustenance (need), and why the few are suggesting them how to destroy themselves.
If you want people to listen to your ideas
a) the last sentence you responded to was "The more one chooses want (suggested) over need (perceivable); the sicker one gets and vice versa."; yet you imply (if) want over need in your one line answer.
b) choice can only exist within perceivable balance (need/want); while being tempted to ignore it for suggested imbalance (want vs not want).
c) IDE'A, noun [Latin idea; Greek to see.] aka perceiving; which implies perceivable (inspiration) as the source. One cannot have ideas; only express different comprehension of the same perceivable source...or ignore it for the suggested "ideology" of others.
d) others need to be used as perceivable inspiration for growth; yet tempt one with suggested information into loss....response-ability represents free will of choice.
e) what if one is tempted to want to listen to suggested words; while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable sound?
f) what is it that others have to say that is more important than the source of sound; they all shape the suggestible words out of? What but nature can those within talk about?
you need to articulate yourself in a more...
a) suggested ART (artifical) CULATE (distinct) tempts one to ignore that only natural distinct whole (perceivable) into partial (perceiving). Artificial (suggested) represents the ignorance of natural (perceivable).
b) "need" represents everything perceivable; "more" represents your choice to ignore need for want; hence wanting more than everything already offered to you.
Mark Passio
How long has he now tried to wake others up, and how few express their awareness? How many followers does he have; and how few of them express themselves like him? How much of his own growth potential has he spend on trying to raise others; who ignore to grow themselves?
What it the choice to present himself as "Mark Passio" is what tempts others to put him on a pedestal; while simultaneously representing the pit to him aka pulling him down; preventing him from growing. How long until he spend all his efforts; while his followers still want more and more and more from him?
There's so much potential for him to grow; yet he keeps arguing with others about information he suggested over a decade ago. He still suggests NESCIENCE (not knowing); while ignore perceivable SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.] aka KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists".
The lack of comprehension among those perceiving everything perceivable is based on their choice to ignore perceivable (need) for suggested (want). He lacks to comprehend that his suggestion of NE (not; nothing) is what tempts others to keep ignoring everything perceivable, and the more he suggests; the more he tempts others to want from him.
Choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law also represents the foundation for the chain of command; which restrains both leaders and followers. The same chain of command as behind the scenes of science...
a) the foundation of "where" for every partial (living) represents the momentum of whole (process of dying).
b) the momentum (balance) of partial (growth) and whole (loss) represents the internal power of EN'ERGY, noun [Greek work.]
c) every BODY (material substance within animation) exists within work (energy) aka as a partial of the whole.
d) suggested websites tempt one to move along a web instead of branching out (comprehension) into perceivable from the perceiving center. The suggested world wide web tries to mimic the whole as to lure the partial from center.
e) one doesn't need a place where others suggest something; one needs to grow comprehension about everything perceivable representing inspiration (need) to grow further or temptation (want) to restrict growth.
outside of comments
Notice the post score (0)...I resist the temptation to suggest information; hence only adapting to perceivable inspiration aka as the partial inside to the whole outside...not to others making suggestions within.
an extremely niche part
a) being one (perceiving) within oneness (perceivable) represents the only one part one can be.
b) NICHE, noun - "hollow; empty space" is what the few suggest to tempt the many to ignore SPACE, noun (Latin spatium; spatior, to wander) + A'LIEN, adjective (Latin alienus, from alius, another) aka one being able to wander among other ones as partials within whole....that ain't empty; but filled to the brim.
of the internet
A NET represents a "cunning device" aka trying to catch you; while INTER aka internal implies already being within. The process of dying doesn't try to catch the living; it generates (loss) them as reactions (growth).
where people are NOT upvoting your ideas in mass?
a) agreement (upvote) vs disagreement (downvote) over suggested information tempts one to ignore the need adaptation to perceivable inspiration. It's ones response-ability (choice) to resist (living) temptation (dying).
b) the praises and insults suggested inspired me to comprehend that as choice one needs to struggle within balance (need/want); while resisting suggested imbalance (want vs not want aka praise vs insult).
c) consenting to others putting one on a pedestal shapes those others into the pit.
d) if I would write for others; than a) I would tempt them to want more and more; b) whatever I write would become the anchor for my growth potential; since others would constantly drag me back to what I did before.
e) to be implies apartheid aka as partial within whole. The few suggest collectivism to "amass" the consenting many; hence e pluribus unum (out of many, one). Why? Because those who ignore apartheid (living) can be directed back into whole (process of dying); while until then they willingly ignore resistance, which allows exploitation of the many by the few.
tl; dr...if you resist the temptation to want from others; then you'll notice that everything is already available to you....yet; resistance requires free will of choice. Instead of collecting from outside; grow within by letting go of accumulated.
a) this (inception towards death) represents the only way for those (life) within.
b) the way doesn't talk; it doesn't suggest information; it doesn't communicate words or writing. It differentiates from whole into partial; it moves differences; it communicates inspiration for adaptation to being moved.
c) PAL'ATABLE, adjective [from palate.] - "agreeable to the taste"...the way (process of dying) requires resistance (hunger) from those (living) within; while tempting (taste) ignorance.
d) it doesn't matter if the living agree (want) or disagree (not want) with the process of dying; since they're forced to adapt (need). If one is directed; then one can only react to being utilized for growth (need) or loss (want); while being temporary (living) within ongoing (process of dying).
OBNOX'IOUS, adjective [Latin ob and noxius, hurtful.]...the way (process of dying) represents hurtful for those (living) struggling within to sustain self; yet blissful for those who ignore the struggle. This is why the many willingly choose self destruction (want) over self sustenance (need), and why the few are suggesting them how to destroy themselves.
a) the last sentence you responded to was "The more one chooses want (suggested) over need (perceivable); the sicker one gets and vice versa."; yet you imply (if) want over need in your one line answer.
b) choice can only exist within perceivable balance (need/want); while being tempted to ignore it for suggested imbalance (want vs not want).
c) IDE'A, noun [Latin idea; Greek to see.] aka perceiving; which implies perceivable (inspiration) as the source. One cannot have ideas; only express different comprehension of the same perceivable source...or ignore it for the suggested "ideology" of others.
d) others need to be used as perceivable inspiration for growth; yet tempt one with suggested information into loss....response-ability represents free will of choice.
e) what if one is tempted to want to listen to suggested words; while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable sound?
f) what is it that others have to say that is more important than the source of sound; they all shape the suggestible words out of? What but nature can those within talk about?
a) suggested ART (artifical) CULATE (distinct) tempts one to ignore that only natural distinct whole (perceivable) into partial (perceiving). Artificial (suggested) represents the ignorance of natural (perceivable).
b) "need" represents everything perceivable; "more" represents your choice to ignore need for want; hence wanting more than everything already offered to you.
How long has he now tried to wake others up, and how few express their awareness? How many followers does he have; and how few of them express themselves like him? How much of his own growth potential has he spend on trying to raise others; who ignore to grow themselves?
What it the choice to present himself as "Mark Passio" is what tempts others to put him on a pedestal; while simultaneously representing the pit to him aka pulling him down; preventing him from growing. How long until he spend all his efforts; while his followers still want more and more and more from him?
There's so much potential for him to grow; yet he keeps arguing with others about information he suggested over a decade ago. He still suggests NESCIENCE (not knowing); while ignore perceivable SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.] aka KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists".
The lack of comprehension among those perceiving everything perceivable is based on their choice to ignore perceivable (need) for suggested (want). He lacks to comprehend that his suggestion of NE (not; nothing) is what tempts others to keep ignoring everything perceivable, and the more he suggests; the more he tempts others to want from him.
Choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law also represents the foundation for the chain of command; which restrains both leaders and followers. The same chain of command as behind the scenes of science...
Where's your website and body of work outside of comments on an extremely niche part of the internet where people are NOT upvoting your ideas in mass?
a) the foundation of "where" for every partial (living) represents the momentum of whole (process of dying).
b) the momentum (balance) of partial (growth) and whole (loss) represents the internal power of EN'ERGY, noun [Greek work.]
c) every BODY (material substance within animation) exists within work (energy) aka as a partial of the whole.
d) suggested websites tempt one to move along a web instead of branching out (comprehension) into perceivable from the perceiving center. The suggested world wide web tries to mimic the whole as to lure the partial from center.
e) one doesn't need a place where others suggest something; one needs to grow comprehension about everything perceivable representing inspiration (need) to grow further or temptation (want) to restrict growth.
Notice the post score (0)...I resist the temptation to suggest information; hence only adapting to perceivable inspiration aka as the partial inside to the whole outside...not to others making suggestions within.
a) being one (perceiving) within oneness (perceivable) represents the only one part one can be.
b) NICHE, noun - "hollow; empty space" is what the few suggest to tempt the many to ignore SPACE, noun (Latin spatium; spatior, to wander) + A'LIEN, adjective (Latin alienus, from alius, another) aka one being able to wander among other ones as partials within whole....that ain't empty; but filled to the brim.
A NET represents a "cunning device" aka trying to catch you; while INTER aka internal implies already being within. The process of dying doesn't try to catch the living; it generates (loss) them as reactions (growth).
a) agreement (upvote) vs disagreement (downvote) over suggested information tempts one to ignore the need adaptation to perceivable inspiration. It's ones response-ability (choice) to resist (living) temptation (dying).
b) the praises and insults suggested inspired me to comprehend that as choice one needs to struggle within balance (need/want); while resisting suggested imbalance (want vs not want aka praise vs insult).
c) consenting to others putting one on a pedestal shapes those others into the pit.
d) if I would write for others; than a) I would tempt them to want more and more; b) whatever I write would become the anchor for my growth potential; since others would constantly drag me back to what I did before.
e) to be implies apartheid aka as partial within whole. The few suggest collectivism to "amass" the consenting many; hence e pluribus unum (out of many, one). Why? Because those who ignore apartheid (living) can be directed back into whole (process of dying); while until then they willingly ignore resistance, which allows exploitation of the many by the few.
tl; dr...if you resist the temptation to want from others; then you'll notice that everything is already available to you....yet; resistance requires free will of choice. Instead of collecting from outside; grow within by letting go of accumulated.
I knew you were just a bunch of hot air and nothing of substance to show.
If you knew you wouldn't suggest "nothing"; since everything perceivable is already shown.
How much more information has to be suggested before the many comprehend that perceivable inspiration offers everything to everyone at every moment?