1933 Baal worship festival.
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (34)
sorted by:
Are we to assume the worship of Baal in The Ten Commandments is also actual worship of Baal - and not part of a larger narrative of Moses and they story of Exodus?
Since the pageant covers the Torah (Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy) and lasted 90 minutes, I guess we should assume anyone who reads Exodus is encouraging the worship of Baal as well?
I mean, do you think a pageant telling this story might include the contents of Exodus 32 - would it not, it is a significant portion of both Christian and Jewish religion that this happened while Moses was being given the 10 Commandments.
Baal was one of Lucifers top agents who rebelled alongside him in 200,000 BC. Moses happened around 800 BC.
The original Cananites that bordered Israel in ancient times were the Baal worshipers. They got destroyed and enslaved but later were freed by King Cyrus.
Dude you can find the script of the play.
This scene represents what happens in Exodus 32.
If this is an actual worship ceremony, do you also think that this is an actual worship ceremony?
Possible but either way, they still do this at the Bohemian Grove.
Wait you say it's a Play but this article says it's real:
https://floridanationalists.com/2022/09/16/video-150k-jews-gather-in-chicago-for-child-sacrifice-ritual-first-president-of-israel-in-attendance/?fbclid=IwAR1xW1mPX2GM5QzYSO_JhG-SuwdwAUfQDPMGVBgUYkesZz1qFfk-KaJ9TrA
Oh - what's that - FLORIDA NATIONALISTS claim it's real?!
OH MY - That's so trustworthy! Surely the history of the World's Fucking Fair is a secret fucking cabal! I mean, they obviously were able to hide 125,000+ people at Soldier's Field - are you stupid?!
I've provided numerous links in the other comments here to contemporaneous newspaper reports about the pageant (a word we don't really use in modern parlance to refer to plays, but absolutely are the same thing) complete with descriptions of the 90+ minute performance and how it was received.
Do you really think you can fill a stadium, in Chicago, in 1933, and get hundreds of reporters to write about it, across the globe, and it be some secret ritual!?
And you wonder why people think conspiracy theorists have room temp IQs.
Florida White Nationalist website as an authoritative source - Jesus, you're the reason for warning labels like "Do Not Eat" on household chemicals aren't you?
Does Exodus 32 tell the same story the play did?
Yawn. You chat so much shit.
What was the news last month Israel was under Egyptian protectorate. It just found a mummified burial chamber in it with a hoard of artifacts.
So much shit on what you assume to be facts.
They simply aren't. The Bible isn't fact. Every story in it is a recreation. There is zero proof of Moses. Zero proof of David and Solomon. They were somebody else.
The Sargon of Akkad is Moses. But it's another tale of mythology, it appears all over the Planet. India, Japan. The 13 commandments are Hummurabi's code laws. Also written on stone. The Babylonian Talmud was wrote first. The Torah was wrote after Jerusalem was rebuilt. It simply renamed a host of common stories. Look it's the lost tribe. They came from somewhere else but got taught something else. I know I know let's just play Chinese whispers instead. Exactly what happened to the child slaves.
So like Romans took these children from the tribes, it was common policy, insuring the tribe wouldn't rebel. Children were slaves. Some gained station. But they all learned Roman.
Have a guess what happens when the Goths freed them? Many go home and no sooner has Christianity spread. No what? They reinvent all their common stories the ones they learned in Babylonian school changing the names to their supposed origin, creating this other place that didn't even exist.
The Babylonians made sure it was a concentric narrative. It is okay for you to be slaves and worship your bedtime deities, because over time you will adopt their narratives, adding all the present rulers, kings, laws, and common stories. The king has ruled it. He will be inserted. Books are burnt, wagging tongues removed. Indoctrination. But suddenly Babylon is destroyed, any slaves get freed. They create a city becoming their own state. What is it. It's no longer Egyptian. Egypt was invaded, and Babylon destroyed. It needs its own origin, sooner lost in translation, muddled into another paradigm. Completely lost in translation. Until even the language's changed.
Happened frequently in history until it constantly sticks out like a great big sore thumb. They've rewrote it. It has happened frequently, almost every time it reformed from war, ruler, or disaster. The books get burnt. Some genius rewrites all over them, adding Charlie Chaplin, they put a hat, pass the hat, and a moustache, onto the Mona Lisa, changing all the street names, pulling down all the statues. Because a grain of salt to a believer is the stuff of undying beliefs. Despite it only having the smallest saltiest grains of, and I still don't know what it is. Because you will never change the salty, their belief binds them to it. But they'll reinvent the script. Look at it currently.
The point is this isn't a worship ceremony.
It's a play that tells the narrative of the first 5 books of the old testament and this is one scene in it based on Exodus 32.
Yawn they aren't fact. Stop your stupid down votes. They don't make me ignorant. They make your ability to host reasonable debate, ignorant. You're unreasonable therefore irrational. You won't see me doing the same.
It was wrote when, exactly after Babylon was destroyed when Jerusalem was built.
Israel was formerly an Egyptian protectorate. If the former city existed it was a copper mining town. Trading with who, if Babylon destroyed it, and took a bunch of child hostages? Egypt. So there was never Moses. Not if he is the Sargon of Akkad. Moses code of laws are also Babylonian. Yes they later changed into the bedtime deity. Like a child at Sunday School away from the complete codex. The child didn't have it. What about creation? Look at the Babylonian version.
They're completely Bullshit, those first 5 books. A 100% recreation of common stories off of the former origin Egypt, and Babylonian, changed into you tell me. It is nonsense. Look at the source where it originated. What happened. It's obvious. Those books haven't accounted for the book of Enoch either. It has just turned up with an insertion. What about all the other stories. Also rewritten.
No, it isn't obvious to the believer, it got scrubbed from history as the paradigm changed. Except the older Babylonian recording is there. Unlike the word of mouth prior to the Torah being written when Jerusalem was built. None of any record before that has a shred of existence, apart from there being this copper mining town trading with who if it was destroyed by Babylon. Egypt. It has even muddled it. 5 minutes later after drowning the Pharaoh in the Exodus, Nile crossing, there the temple, is with Cleopatra? No, who. Didn't exist. All the events have been rewritten. All of them.
Work it out stop spouting it.
Baal their god isn't our god. It's quite simple. But their god, sacrificed children. Hahaha. Read your testament. They ate children in the seige of Babylon. Sacrificed others. Chopped baby's in half. Because which one did he fuck. Come on which concubine was it. Which would get his judgement. He had a wife but does what with Shebba. So concubines brought that judgement. Which one was royal and would be granted status. Fuck it, kill it.
So naive. It's thrilling your passion for beliefs. But it's laughable and ignorant.
Of course there is a marker. But it's like looking at a map with X marks the spot. Completely crossed over. Completely changed, and rewritten, until a distinct pattern emerges. A pattern from the former recordings.
Can affixed words (growth) translate ongoing sound (loss) or do they tempt those within loss (process of dying) to ignore growing (living) within perceivable (sound) for holding onto suggested (words)?
If one slaps a label on form within flow; then that label doesn't prevent flow to destroy form. If you let a "candle" burn out; do you still call the remains a "candle"? Could it be that the suggested brand "candle" was lost in translation through the perceivable process of burning out? Why do you consent to the label "candle" if you can already comprehend that the outcome of it contradicts the label "candle"?