Can anyone point me to a politician in the West, with executive power and not a legislator, who mouths all the usual bromides about support for Israel, but who after getting into power, did absolutely nothing on the issue, or perhaps actively worked against Israel's foreign policy interests?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (42)
sorted by:
a) one ignores power when using it to consent to be represented by the power of others.
b) getting into suggested power implies being vetted by the ones wielding it.
c) the power of the "chosen ones" represents each other ones ignorance of representing choice.
d) the few wield the ignorance of the many as the power over them.
Natural law represents LEGIS (law) LATUM (given); those within represent EX (out of; from) SEQUOR (to follow); hence one being executive (living) within legislating (process of dying).
All suggested legislation by the few tempt the many to consent to submission of choice...a choice required to execute within the legislating natural law, hence expressing (growth) within impression (loss).
a) that which HE BREWS (process of dying); she transmutes out of (living). A suggested brand to hide an alchemical process.
b) ISRAEL; noun - "the jewish people". he-brew no "j"; hence "yew" aka kabbalistic phonetic for "YOU"
c) the few suggest jew vs gentile to tempt the many to ignore oneself (me) among the "generated yous". For the generated (process of dying) me (living) every one else represents a perceivable "you". Who can one blame but other ones? Who can I blame but the YOUS (jews)? Are the YOUS (jews) living rent free in my head when I choose to blame others?
d) what if all represents one in energy? What if one (perceiving) exists within oneness (perceivable) aka as partial (living) transmuted out of whole (process of dying) aka as temporary growth within ongoing loss?
What if being form (life) within flow (inception towards death) implies flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death) aka ingredient transmuted out of base alchemy?
e) what if one thing (perceiving) within everything (perceivable) can be suggested to ignore it for nothing? What if the suggested word (fiction) tempts one to ignore the perceivable sound (reality)? What if consenting to suggested over perceivable allows those suggesting to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested meaning at their free will of choice?
f) what if choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; not only binds one to the choice of others; but also tempts one to ignore being reaction (perceiving) within enacting (perceivable) under natural law?
SUPPORT, verb [Latin supporto; sub and porto, to carry.] - "to sustain"...what if support implies self sustenance by carrying the burden of response-ability (living) within temptation (process of dying)?