The Lost History Of Flat Earth
(www.bitchute.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
Have you heard of tells? Read how they say they're supposed to have formed, then try to picture the process and convince yourself that's what really happened.
As far as I can tell (haha), these are sites that have been hit with mudfloods. Some mainstream article about one of them mentioned that it had ten layers of buried settlements.
If mudfloods were a natural occurrence, how could they possibly happen multiple times right on a settlement? Also, everything would have been flooded, and you can see from the pic right on the wiki page that it's just on the city. It must be a weapon.
There's not a single sentence in any history book about any of the truth of this, at least no book that still exists publicly. When I think about these tells all over the world, and the history that has been hidden or destroyed, and how only a handful realize what must have happened, well, it's quite the black pill.
I credit myself as being an optimist for not having jumped off a bridge before now... LOL.
I considered the thesis that it was caused by a natural event, but if it were so then you'd find all sorts of natural structures buried under the mud, and widespread discontinuities in the stratigraphy. The mainstream is aware of the latter and it's rare.
One example I can think of is where a petrified forest was exposed somewhere along the coast of the Pacific Northwest. They suspected inundation by a tsunami and were able to guess at the late 1700's. It turns out they traced it back to records of a big earthquake in Japan right at that time.
The only other similar example I know is Pompeii, which was ash and not mud. Again, the vast majority of places in the world are not sites of human habitation so "mud flooding" of dwellings should be very rare indeed.