Ok, finished up the mystery of the sunken buildings and inability for victorian era people to build structures. heh.
First challenge would be, how come there are none of these amazing structures all over north america like in europe? why are all the ones here in step with the timeline projected with our current framework?
Are you going to try to proclaim that cities such as new york are from a time long ago also? What about the rest of the country?
Or is it that the flat earther population never made it to north america to face off with the injuns in all of history?
The dig sites around north america show the natives living here at least 13k years, do we not accept any of that information when we flat earth?
Being that the guy just left that section and went into mistreating women in history, there is no firm explanation of anything just this claim that we couldn't have done it therefore... ? flat earth? this was done in the past by people better than us? Did I click thru something important?
What I want, is a clear listing of the claims that allow one to accept the flat earth belief system.
I would also like to accompany it a list of as many claims that are rejected due to the flat earth belief as is possible (sun is a lamp, sun and moon are close, no asteroid?) shit like that.
So if you wanted to simplify getting someone to accept this you would be able to have a point form listing of what specific points would be used to persuade someone.
I can then take each of those points and research them individually.
The last thing I want, is a fucking salesman or some other evangelist to preach to me their belief and all the fail reasons in their logic why they clamber for what is most likely nonsense given the total amount of information they have on the topic.
What I want, is a clear listing of the claims that allow one to accept the flat earth belief system.
This is a historical time line and overview of the concept and misrepresentation of flat earth. It was not created to answer a Question you crafted 4 minutes ago. Do you understand how linear time works? This video was made in the past. It does not answer to you. Are you capable of watching a video without seeking recognition from others?
Each discourse with you reminds me of the vile simplicity running in your brain to speak so highly of something you really know nothing about.
It is easy to identify you in a crowd with this knowledge, do you know that?
People so simple, led by their noses anywhere.
So, this 'question' is not something I came up with a mere four minutes ago, I have been questing for the frank list of main points of belief that are used to subjugate people like you into believing something with next to no evidence for a while now.
So if you would be so kind, it would really speed this whole shit up.
Just produce a small list of the main points that draw you to the conclusion we are on a flat earth. So far all the points I have reviewed do not strike me as anything other than hyperbole.
Ok, finished up the mystery of the sunken buildings and inability for victorian era people to build structures. heh.
First challenge would be, how come there are none of these amazing structures all over north america like in europe? why are all the ones here in step with the timeline projected with our current framework?
Are you going to try to proclaim that cities such as new york are from a time long ago also? What about the rest of the country?
Or is it that the flat earther population never made it to north america to face off with the injuns in all of history?
The dig sites around north america show the natives living here at least 13k years, do we not accept any of that information when we flat earth?
Being that the guy just left that section and went into mistreating women in history, there is no firm explanation of anything just this claim that we couldn't have done it therefore... ? flat earth? this was done in the past by people better than us? Did I click thru something important?
Getting you to sit still for six hours?
Here is a five hour version with increased speed. See if you can escape the endorphin feedback loop for even that long.
What I want, is a clear listing of the claims that allow one to accept the flat earth belief system.
I would also like to accompany it a list of as many claims that are rejected due to the flat earth belief as is possible (sun is a lamp, sun and moon are close, no asteroid?) shit like that.
So if you wanted to simplify getting someone to accept this you would be able to have a point form listing of what specific points would be used to persuade someone.
I can then take each of those points and research them individually.
The last thing I want, is a fucking salesman or some other evangelist to preach to me their belief and all the fail reasons in their logic why they clamber for what is most likely nonsense given the total amount of information they have on the topic.
This is a historical time line and overview of the concept and misrepresentation of flat earth. It was not created to answer a Question you crafted 4 minutes ago. Do you understand how linear time works? This video was made in the past. It does not answer to you. Are you capable of watching a video without seeking recognition from others?
Each discourse with you reminds me of the vile simplicity running in your brain to speak so highly of something you really know nothing about.
It is easy to identify you in a crowd with this knowledge, do you know that? People so simple, led by their noses anywhere.
So, this 'question' is not something I came up with a mere four minutes ago, I have been questing for the frank list of main points of belief that are used to subjugate people like you into believing something with next to no evidence for a while now.
So if you would be so kind, it would really speed this whole shit up.
Just produce a small list of the main points that draw you to the conclusion we are on a flat earth. So far all the points I have reviewed do not strike me as anything other than hyperbole.