EwarAnon has turned out to be a Flat Earth shill (no offense, Flatulists, go ahead and believe anything that makes you comfortable) but the photos of Mud Flood building, star forts, old maps, etc, are stunning.
I fear that sort of material is being memory-holed as we speak. (Never noticed it happening? That's how it works.) Frankly, I'm shocked how much has survived to the present day. For that reason, I archived this video some time ago.
Have you heard of tells? Read how they say they're supposed to have formed, then try to picture the process and convince yourself that's what really happened.
As far as I can tell (haha), these are sites that have been hit with mudfloods. Some mainstream article about one of them mentioned that it had ten layers of buried settlements.
If mudfloods were a natural occurrence, how could they possibly happen multiple times right on a settlement? Also, everything would have been flooded, and you can see from the pic right on the wiki page that it's just on the city. It must be a weapon.
There's not a single sentence in any history book about any of the truth of this, at least no book that still exists publicly. When I think about these tells all over the world, and the history that has been hidden or destroyed, and how only a handful realize what must have happened, well, it's quite the black pill.
I credit myself as being an optimist for not having jumped off a bridge before now... LOL.
I considered the thesis that it was caused by a natural event, but if it were so then you'd find all sorts of natural structures buried under the mud, and widespread discontinuities in the stratigraphy. The mainstream is aware of the latter and it's rare.
One example I can think of is where a petrified forest was exposed somewhere along the coast of the Pacific Northwest. They suspected inundation by a tsunami and were able to guess at the late 1700's. It turns out they traced it back to records of a big earthquake in Japan right at that time.
The only other similar example I know is Pompeii, which was ash and not mud. Again, the vast majority of places in the world are not sites of human habitation so "mud flooding" of dwellings should be very rare indeed.
I watched the whole thing last time it was posted. It made me feel dirty, like I had intentionally cluttered my mind with garbage. The feeling lingered for hours. Flat Earth is a mind virus.
I give the narrator an A for dramatic presentation, though.
I am uncertain what you mean by "hide comment history". Though you can block users, but you can not disable comment replies. Hope that helps.
Oh and thanks for telling me that I posted a mind virus that will break peoples brains. That all sounds super scary, and I have vowed to never play the game ever again.
sigh clearly all bullshit, at double speed I made it like 15m in so far and he is still bla bla bla bla, fucking blase.
As for the pictures with no people, this is easily explained yet people seem to have forgotten.
Important images taken at that time were done by authority, anyone caught in the frame would be executed along with their entire families, this was basically an everywhere thing for these types of pictures, which is why you can find them from all over.
I will keep click skipping thru his sales pitch of lies and bullshit for the simple minded cause 6hr of lame edits wtf.
The belief that everything we think we know is false and nothing is true or has value and we don't have the real answers is for idiots.
I would prefer to accept what is thought to be true instead of a constant stream of sales pitch and lies.
Right. You watched 15 minutes of a video. And now you want a cookie! Why don't you go back to reddit and post pictures of your boyfriend getting vaxxed for Biden.
I will keep click skipping thru
Of course you will. Don't want to think about anything for too long.
lol, I am at least willing to communicate on your fail belief, I am still clicking thru it, don't be such a poor sport.
Surely you do not expect me to require his entire bla bla bla for a given point? I hear his point click thru the section while viewing the evidential points being claimed.
It is 6/2 fucking hours, you think I am gonna waste that much time on crazy ass propaganda, you will only see me do that for war stuff :)
Take for example the claim that the buildings are 'sunk' working my way thru that now. It is easy for these type of people to make all kinds of claims about pictures they do not understand, I have a fairly seasoned background and understand why many of these buildings appear to have sunk / be built below and such. Just hanging around in this section till I get the drift of what the claim he is to make of these buildings being sunk.
You didn't even ask yourself why it was important that there were no people. You didn't even realized that cameras at that time didn't have slow shutter speeds, and that five minutes later, they are showing other cities WITH people. Did you see the solitary horse and cart? Was it the only parked horse in the city that stayed stationary for 30 seconds, and it never moved it's head?
Surely you do not expect me to require his entire bla bla bla for a given point?
Do you even realized that you are arguing a strawman? Bla, bla bla? That's you! You are saying that! You are arguing against yourself! You've proped up the counter point as "bla bla bla" and are knocking it down, as though to give yourself credibility.
Take for example the claim that the buildings are 'sunk' working my way thru that now.
It hasn't been six hours. You're skipping around and rolling your eyes like a child, and you don't even know why you are discrediting these points, because you don't even know why they are being brought up in the first place!
I already told you why there was no people, do you need to go back and re-read it?
Do you not understand people at all? Imagine living in an era with no phones first of all. No TV no electricity no running water.
The boss tells you it is photo time. It is basically a sacred event.
If a man and a cart was in the shot, holding pose, it was art. clearly.
Seriously, if you are watching crap like this at normal speed and trying to hang on every word he repeats over and over, its no fucking wonder you are a bit insane huh?
I will imagine based on your statements, that I have collected more information about the claims in this video to the point I am than you have.
Again, I have made some points, the video is still there paused, I will try to make it to the end, because I can honestly admit I am a bit curious why people are clambering for this belief over all the other stupid shit people have to choose from.
So far, given the 'episodes' within the video I can comfortably tell you, this guy is a salesman delivering a salespitch and it is at least 98% bullshit based on that alone.
So far 0 evidence 0 facts just wild claims bordering nonsense.
Imagine a car salesman saying "Look, if you buy this car... I will throw in $1,000 of my own money!"
I didn't ask you why there are no people in the photo. I instructed you on the fact that you don't understand why the topic was brought up in the first place. Because you are not paying attention, and are simply reacting!
Stop focusing on coming up with counterpoints to Questions I never asked of you!
So you are now confident, that the topic is fake, because you don't even know what the topic is? Sir, you have bested me. I have no argument I can present to a man who openly preaches his inability and outright refusal to think. You are insane.
Ok, finished up the mystery of the sunken buildings and inability for victorian era people to build structures. heh.
First challenge would be, how come there are none of these amazing structures all over north america like in europe? why are all the ones here in step with the timeline projected with our current framework?
Are you going to try to proclaim that cities such as new york are from a time long ago also? What about the rest of the country?
Or is it that the flat earther population never made it to north america to face off with the injuns in all of history?
The dig sites around north america show the natives living here at least 13k years, do we not accept any of that information when we flat earth?
Being that the guy just left that section and went into mistreating women in history, there is no firm explanation of anything just this claim that we couldn't have done it therefore... ? flat earth? this was done in the past by people better than us? Did I click thru something important?
What I want, is a clear listing of the claims that allow one to accept the flat earth belief system.
I would also like to accompany it a list of as many claims that are rejected due to the flat earth belief as is possible (sun is a lamp, sun and moon are close, no asteroid?) shit like that.
So if you wanted to simplify getting someone to accept this you would be able to have a point form listing of what specific points would be used to persuade someone.
I can then take each of those points and research them individually.
The last thing I want, is a fucking salesman or some other evangelist to preach to me their belief and all the fail reasons in their logic why they clamber for what is most likely nonsense given the total amount of information they have on the topic.
What I want, is a clear listing of the claims that allow one to accept the flat earth belief system.
This is a historical time line and overview of the concept and misrepresentation of flat earth. It was not created to answer a Question you crafted 4 minutes ago. Do you understand how linear time works? This video was made in the past. It does not answer to you. Are you capable of watching a video without seeking recognition from others?
Each discourse with you reminds me of the vile simplicity running in your brain to speak so highly of something you really know nothing about.
It is easy to identify you in a crowd with this knowledge, do you know that?
People so simple, led by their noses anywhere.
So, this 'question' is not something I came up with a mere four minutes ago, I have been questing for the frank list of main points of belief that are used to subjugate people like you into believing something with next to no evidence for a while now.
So if you would be so kind, it would really speed this whole shit up.
Just produce a small list of the main points that draw you to the conclusion we are on a flat earth. So far all the points I have reviewed do not strike me as anything other than hyperbole.
Each discourse with you reminds me of the vile simplicity running in your brain to speak so highly of something you really know nothing about.
I'm literally just trying to get you to watch the video. In real time, objectively. As for this 'something' you have brought up, that I 'speak highly of'.
No such thing has occurred.
So if you would be so kind, it would really speed this whole shit up.
I literally linked you to a sped up version of the video that I am trying to get you to watch. If you don't want to watch it. Just shut the fuck up, and go away.
EwarAnon has turned out to be a Flat Earth shill (no offense, Flatulists, go ahead and believe anything that makes you comfortable) but the photos of Mud Flood building, star forts, old maps, etc, are stunning.
I fear that sort of material is being memory-holed as we speak. (Never noticed it happening? That's how it works.) Frankly, I'm shocked how much has survived to the present day. For that reason, I archived this video some time ago.
Have you heard of tells? Read how they say they're supposed to have formed, then try to picture the process and convince yourself that's what really happened.
As far as I can tell (haha), these are sites that have been hit with mudfloods. Some mainstream article about one of them mentioned that it had ten layers of buried settlements.
If mudfloods were a natural occurrence, how could they possibly happen multiple times right on a settlement? Also, everything would have been flooded, and you can see from the pic right on the wiki page that it's just on the city. It must be a weapon.
There's not a single sentence in any history book about any of the truth of this, at least no book that still exists publicly. When I think about these tells all over the world, and the history that has been hidden or destroyed, and how only a handful realize what must have happened, well, it's quite the black pill.
I credit myself as being an optimist for not having jumped off a bridge before now... LOL.
I considered the thesis that it was caused by a natural event, but if it were so then you'd find all sorts of natural structures buried under the mud, and widespread discontinuities in the stratigraphy. The mainstream is aware of the latter and it's rare.
One example I can think of is where a petrified forest was exposed somewhere along the coast of the Pacific Northwest. They suspected inundation by a tsunami and were able to guess at the late 1700's. It turns out they traced it back to records of a big earthquake in Japan right at that time.
The only other similar example I know is Pompeii, which was ash and not mud. Again, the vast majority of places in the world are not sites of human habitation so "mud flooding" of dwellings should be very rare indeed.
I watched the whole thing last time it was posted. It made me feel dirty, like I had intentionally cluttered my mind with garbage. The feeling lingered for hours. Flat Earth is a mind virus.
I give the narrator an A for dramatic presentation, though.
Yagh, I got the same feeling after consorting with your Mother.
I give her an A for playing the trombone while tossing a salad.
No homo.
Didn't there used to be an option to hide comment history? I don't see it in the settings now.
I am uncertain what you mean by "hide comment history". Though you can block users, but you can not disable comment replies. Hope that helps.
Oh and thanks for telling me that I posted a mind virus that will break peoples brains. That all sounds super scary, and I have vowed to never play the game ever again.
sigh clearly all bullshit, at double speed I made it like 15m in so far and he is still bla bla bla bla, fucking blase.
As for the pictures with no people, this is easily explained yet people seem to have forgotten.
Important images taken at that time were done by authority, anyone caught in the frame would be executed along with their entire families, this was basically an everywhere thing for these types of pictures, which is why you can find them from all over.
I will keep click skipping thru his sales pitch of lies and bullshit for the simple minded cause 6hr of lame edits wtf.
The belief that everything we think we know is false and nothing is true or has value and we don't have the real answers is for idiots.
I would prefer to accept what is thought to be true instead of a constant stream of sales pitch and lies.
Right. You watched 15 minutes of a video. And now you want a cookie! Why don't you go back to reddit and post pictures of your boyfriend getting vaxxed for Biden.
Of course you will. Don't want to think about anything for too long.
u/HonestPieceOfShit
lol, I am at least willing to communicate on your fail belief, I am still clicking thru it, don't be such a poor sport.
Surely you do not expect me to require his entire bla bla bla for a given point? I hear his point click thru the section while viewing the evidential points being claimed. It is 6/2 fucking hours, you think I am gonna waste that much time on crazy ass propaganda, you will only see me do that for war stuff :)
Take for example the claim that the buildings are 'sunk' working my way thru that now. It is easy for these type of people to make all kinds of claims about pictures they do not understand, I have a fairly seasoned background and understand why many of these buildings appear to have sunk / be built below and such. Just hanging around in this section till I get the drift of what the claim he is to make of these buildings being sunk.
You didn't even ask yourself why it was important that there were no people. You didn't even realized that cameras at that time didn't have slow shutter speeds, and that five minutes later, they are showing other cities WITH people. Did you see the solitary horse and cart? Was it the only parked horse in the city that stayed stationary for 30 seconds, and it never moved it's head?
Do you even realized that you are arguing a strawman? Bla, bla bla? That's you! You are saying that! You are arguing against yourself! You've proped up the counter point as "bla bla bla" and are knocking it down, as though to give yourself credibility.
It hasn't been six hours. You're skipping around and rolling your eyes like a child, and you don't even know why you are discrediting these points, because you don't even know why they are being brought up in the first place!
I already told you why there was no people, do you need to go back and re-read it? Do you not understand people at all? Imagine living in an era with no phones first of all. No TV no electricity no running water.
The boss tells you it is photo time. It is basically a sacred event. If a man and a cart was in the shot, holding pose, it was art. clearly.
Seriously, if you are watching crap like this at normal speed and trying to hang on every word he repeats over and over, its no fucking wonder you are a bit insane huh?
I will imagine based on your statements, that I have collected more information about the claims in this video to the point I am than you have.
Again, I have made some points, the video is still there paused, I will try to make it to the end, because I can honestly admit I am a bit curious why people are clambering for this belief over all the other stupid shit people have to choose from.
So far, given the 'episodes' within the video I can comfortably tell you, this guy is a salesman delivering a salespitch and it is at least 98% bullshit based on that alone.
So far 0 evidence 0 facts just wild claims bordering nonsense.
Imagine a car salesman saying "Look, if you buy this car... I will throw in $1,000 of my own money!"
I didn't ask you why there are no people in the photo. I instructed you on the fact that you don't understand why the topic was brought up in the first place. Because you are not paying attention, and are simply reacting!
Stop focusing on coming up with counterpoints to Questions I never asked of you!
I don't need some imaginary reason to explain why there are no people in photo's.
You do.
I am confident in my current understanding of the importance of capturing frames in the past and in the present.
So you are now confident, that the topic is fake, because you don't even know what the topic is? Sir, you have bested me. I have no argument I can present to a man who openly preaches his inability and outright refusal to think. You are insane.
Ok, finished up the mystery of the sunken buildings and inability for victorian era people to build structures. heh.
First challenge would be, how come there are none of these amazing structures all over north america like in europe? why are all the ones here in step with the timeline projected with our current framework?
Are you going to try to proclaim that cities such as new york are from a time long ago also? What about the rest of the country?
Or is it that the flat earther population never made it to north america to face off with the injuns in all of history?
The dig sites around north america show the natives living here at least 13k years, do we not accept any of that information when we flat earth?
Being that the guy just left that section and went into mistreating women in history, there is no firm explanation of anything just this claim that we couldn't have done it therefore... ? flat earth? this was done in the past by people better than us? Did I click thru something important?
Getting you to sit still for six hours?
Here is a five hour version with increased speed. See if you can escape the endorphin feedback loop for even that long.
What I want, is a clear listing of the claims that allow one to accept the flat earth belief system.
I would also like to accompany it a list of as many claims that are rejected due to the flat earth belief as is possible (sun is a lamp, sun and moon are close, no asteroid?) shit like that.
So if you wanted to simplify getting someone to accept this you would be able to have a point form listing of what specific points would be used to persuade someone.
I can then take each of those points and research them individually.
The last thing I want, is a fucking salesman or some other evangelist to preach to me their belief and all the fail reasons in their logic why they clamber for what is most likely nonsense given the total amount of information they have on the topic.
This is a historical time line and overview of the concept and misrepresentation of flat earth. It was not created to answer a Question you crafted 4 minutes ago. Do you understand how linear time works? This video was made in the past. It does not answer to you. Are you capable of watching a video without seeking recognition from others?
Each discourse with you reminds me of the vile simplicity running in your brain to speak so highly of something you really know nothing about.
It is easy to identify you in a crowd with this knowledge, do you know that? People so simple, led by their noses anywhere.
So, this 'question' is not something I came up with a mere four minutes ago, I have been questing for the frank list of main points of belief that are used to subjugate people like you into believing something with next to no evidence for a while now.
So if you would be so kind, it would really speed this whole shit up.
Just produce a small list of the main points that draw you to the conclusion we are on a flat earth. So far all the points I have reviewed do not strike me as anything other than hyperbole.
I'm literally just trying to get you to watch the video. In real time, objectively. As for this 'something' you have brought up, that I 'speak highly of'.
No such thing has occurred.
I literally linked you to a sped up version of the video that I am trying to get you to watch. If you don't want to watch it. Just shut the fuck up, and go away.