Not sure what you mean 'flat pill' For me that would be an analysis on available evidence forming an acceptance.
I have been examining global/flat earth theories for years.
They both include a plethora of false formula and belief sets to enforce the position.
Let's start back at the beginning, when flat earth was documented as a belief and the information used to form that claim.
I would propose you simply provide for me a number of points that you use to form your flat earth acceptance.
And if we are moving on am orbit that spins, wobbles and spirals through the galaxy, why is polarise always magically above our north pole and why does orion always line up with the pyramids, perfectly.
In this claim you are not really able to visualize why this is.
The planet is not spiraling out of context on its own, if there is a spiral it is all spiraling. where does the spiral come from?
I no longer accept the big bang theory. I prefer plasma cosmology, it makes much more sense.
But, in the 'big bang' theory we are projected from a start point along a vector as a solar system, so the sun. The earth is trapped in gravity around the sun as it travels. So traveling as a group, it is planar as in what stays up stays up. based on this, we see what we expect to see.
Heh, well I think I understand, you seem to think that all of this stuff is stationary while we do a thing inside of it, thus we should be spinning and such around them in such a way they are offset as time passes.
Meanwhile, everything we can make out is basically in a large unit traveling together relative to each other.
I am intrigued by your rejection here, feel free to explain why this hypothesis holds no value to you.
The guy you're replying to is a troll
Not sure what you mean 'flat pill' For me that would be an analysis on available evidence forming an acceptance.
I have been examining global/flat earth theories for years.
They both include a plethora of false formula and belief sets to enforce the position.
Let's start back at the beginning, when flat earth was documented as a belief and the information used to form that claim.
I would propose you simply provide for me a number of points that you use to form your flat earth acceptance.
In this claim you are not really able to visualize why this is. The planet is not spiraling out of context on its own, if there is a spiral it is all spiraling. where does the spiral come from?
I no longer accept the big bang theory. I prefer plasma cosmology, it makes much more sense.
But, in the 'big bang' theory we are projected from a start point along a vector as a solar system, so the sun. The earth is trapped in gravity around the sun as it travels. So traveling as a group, it is planar as in what stays up stays up. based on this, we see what we expect to see.
Heh, well I think I understand, you seem to think that all of this stuff is stationary while we do a thing inside of it, thus we should be spinning and such around them in such a way they are offset as time passes.
Meanwhile, everything we can make out is basically in a large unit traveling together relative to each other.
Plasma cosmology explains this better.