You ascribe only to them what positives you yourself wish to be recognized for, and I see you fail to mention a single negative to keep them grounded and on par with the rest of us mere mortals. That you’re on the conspiracy section of this website and aren’t starting off your search for the real answer with dismissing everything you can read and be taught by those in authority as possibly but most probably corrupted to suit an agenda and not the real truth is quite frankly disappointing. I ain’t mad at you. I know it’s not even you. You’re parroting the shit you’ve swallowed and I don’t like what those who fed you did but I certainly have no vitriol towards you personally. Choosing an answer because it’s what you want to be true is a horrible way to get to the truth behind something much less your live your whole life by it.
And if you wish to defer to old scholars and those with higher intellect and reasoning than ourselves I shall indulge in the appeal to authority fallacy and add: Around 1880, some French professors attempted to formulate a secular morality, they expressed it more or less in these words: God is a useless and a costly hypothesis, so we will do without it.