Greetings Conspirators. I was using greatawakening.win and had shared what I thought was some valuable information with the community for many, many months and then I was banned for stating too many unpleasant truths or asking too many questions about DJT. It is super creepy because I tried making a new account over a year later on a different phone but the system still remembers me as a banned user! Is that weird to anyone? I am low tech so I guess they maybe banned by IP address because I don't use a VPN? Anyway, I probably won't stay on this forum because I'm kindof over being censored on the internet but am posting here more than anything just to see if the damn thing posts and if anyone responds to it! Thanks in advance for anyone who bothers to comment. Censorship is absolutely happening on the right, not just on the left.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (17)
sorted by:
Inception towards death represents the direction for life. Being directed from inception towards death "inspires" life to resist. Life exists within the perceivable flow of inspiration; while the few tempt the many to ignore this for a suggested flow of information.
Those who consent to suggested information (want) over perceivable inspiration (need) can then be "directed" by the suggestions of others.
a) perceivable inspiration cannot be censored; only ignored.
b) truth vs lie represents wanting vs not wanting suggested information; while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable inspiration.
c) nature doesn't lie; nor does it define any true information...it simply moves everything forwards; hence communicating perceivable inspiration to everything living within; which implies the inspiration for the living to resist being moved towards death.
d) the parasitic few idolize the perceivable nature (moving) by tempting the ignorant many to brand it (affixed). This tricks the many to reason (want vs not want) over suggested words (information) while ignoring perceivable sound (inspiration). This represents spell-craft.
e) control isn't about winning within true vs false conflicts (reasoning); but about tricking the many into playing the suggested game of reasoning through choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law; while they ignore balance (perceivable) to choice (perceiving) natural law.
f) reason represents division (want vs not want) by suggestion (want over need). Having choice implies being at the center of balance (need/want) aka in-between perceivable (need) and suggested (want).
g) perceivable inspiration doesn't require to be exposed, since it always available to each one resisting the temptation to ignore it for whatever others are suggesting them.
Others suggest sides (want or not want) to tempt one to ignore being the center (choice) of balance (need/want). Consenting to suggested (want) over perceivable (need) causes imbalance (want versus not want); while ignoring balance (need/want).
It's never "our side"; it's always ones ignorance of being center. Example...choose to step left and it implies coming from right and vice versa. No conflict within perceivable, yet consent to suggested and you put yourself into a left vs right conflict of reason.
Choice exists within perceivable balance. Ignoring this causes imbalance for choice. Others choose to imbalance ones choice by suggesting imbalance.
Consent to any suggested information and you give those suggesting it the control over defining (idolatry), redefining (revisionism) and contradicting (talmudic reasoning) the meaning thereof...a meaning you willingly uphold within your mind. That represents thought control; which the parasitic few industrialized among the ignorant many as GOVERN (to control) MENT (Latin mens; mind; Greek memory)
Before that comes choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law; which they also industrialized as RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew). The original bond represents balance (perceivable) to choice (perceiving); while being bound anew represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion).
Temporary living implies within the ongoing process of dying aka as the partial (perceiving) within the whole (perceivable). In other words...to be implies within; out of and in response to origin. The few suggest outcomes (progressivism) to tempt the many to ignore origin; hence tempting them to ignore living for fear of dying.
Where implies as form (life) within the momentum (balance) of flow (inception towards death) aka as the center (choice) of a balance based system aka EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power".
a) you exist within everything perceivable. Others suggest you nothing (not) to tempt you to ignore adapting to everything. Ask yourself if one can perceive "no; not; nothing; nothingness" and if "not", then why does one constantly use the suggested words for it?
b) hope implies towards suggested outcomes; which tempts one to ignore response-ability (choice) within perceivable origin (balance).
c) hope vs fear represents yet another rebranding of want vs not want reasoning; just like true vs false; good vs evil; left vs right; communism vs capitalism; Trump vs Biden; rich vs poor; nationalism vs internationalism; Russia vs Ukraine; Vaxxed vs Unvaxxed; pro-life vs pro-choice; Christian vs Muslim; soccer vs football; us vs them; jew vs gentile; big mac vs whopper; console vs pc; upvote vs downvote; black vs white; feminism vs patriarchy; cops vs robbers, star wars vs star trek; coffee vs tea; humans vs animals and so on.
Different rebrand (suggestion); same foundation (perception).
Perceivable to perceiving aka impression (process of dying) for expression (living) represents communication; others suggest miscommunication (agreement vs disagreement) as the temptation to ignore to communicate as partial (choice) to whole (balance).
Being within perceivable sound allows the choice of resonance (need) or dissonance (want), so either resonance with perceivable or dissonance among suggested...your choice.
Those who ignore natural sound for artificial words aka TECHNOL'OGY, noun [Gr. art, and word or discourse.] are being ruthlessly exploited by those suggesting words (fiction) over sound (reality).
I think you have something interesting to share but you know what I have no idea what you're trying to say to me. Maybe I got injected with too many vaccines as a child but my brain is not really processing the overall points you are trying to make, only snippets. So, thanks for the time spent writing all that and sorry I don't get it.
a) the many are being domesticated to understand (stand under) what the few are suggesting them; hence being trip-fed snippets of suggested information to slowly build a whole narrative within their minds.
b) what the many are ignoring is being the partial (perceiving) within the whole (perceivable).
c) the many are being tempted to put suggested snippets together as to finish the "puzzle" of the whole. Meanwhile in reality...the ongoing whole (process of dying) takes the temporary partial (living) apart...unless resisted.
In short...the few trick the many to piece fiction together; while the many ignore being taken apart by perceivable reality. All the narratives the few are suggesting are tempting the many to ignore perceivable reality...living within the process of dying, hence in need to resist (living) temptation (dying).
Life being moved from inception towards death implies being processed; being within a process; being the reaction (living) within an enacting process (dying).
One needs to compress (comprehension) what's impressing (perceivable) for expression (growth)...if one ignores that for the suggestions by others; then one fell for the temptation of repression (loss).
a) KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists" aka perceivable inspiration; not suggested information.
b) IDE'A, noun [Latin idea; Gr. to see, Latin video.] aka both comprehension about perceivable (need) or understanding of suggested (want)...depending on ones free will of choice.
Either you see form (life) within flow (inception towards death) and it's behavior as moving differences (inspiration) through your perceiving senses; or you ignore all of this for what others suggest it means and the words they use to brand the moving system.
"wind" doesn't require the suggested brand "wind" to be perceivable...neither does anything else require a brand. The snippets you mentioned before represent suggested words by others, which you are trying to puzzle together to achieve understanding. If you would adapt to the behavior of "wind"; then you would slowly grow more and more comprehension about the perceivable, and your adaptation to being moved represents your resistance (living) within velocity (dying).
VAC'CINE, adjective [Latin vaccinus, from vacca, a cow.]...way too many willing cattle (goyim) indeed.