Greetings Conspirators. I was using greatawakening.win and had shared what I thought was some valuable information with the community for many, many months and then I was banned for stating too many unpleasant truths or asking too many questions about DJT. It is super creepy because I tried making a new account over a year later on a different phone but the system still remembers me as a banned user! Is that weird to anyone? I am low tech so I guess they maybe banned by IP address because I don't use a VPN? Anyway, I probably won't stay on this forum because I'm kindof over being censored on the internet but am posting here more than anything just to see if the damn thing posts and if anyone responds to it! Thanks in advance for anyone who bothers to comment. Censorship is absolutely happening on the right, not just on the left.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (17)
sorted by:
Yes, mods can ban and then there are 2 other options, "IP ban" stops you from making a new account on the IP you were using, and "Nuke" deletes all your comments and posts on the forum. It's handy for banning spam bots and all their comments at once. It's unfortunate that some use it so casually though.
You may be able to reset your IP address by turning off your router for a period of time, if you're using one, and then turning it back on. This is dependent on your ISP, and the amount of time can vary. Basically you are waiting for that IP address contract to expire due to inactivity, something like that. Some ISP's assign you a permanent IP though. You may also be able to use a browser with tor such as Brave to access the website from a different IP. There are free VPN services too, though I remember them being not so good, but they may have improved.
Thanks so much for the tips! I didn't get the impression that the mods thought I was a bot. I believe they just wanted to protect the forum as a very pro DJT site. I don't remember what it said now but one of the mods messaged me inviting me to recant whatever I had stated but I thought what I said was truthful so I told the mod that I could not retract it and that is when they said good luck to me and banned me.
It was the same experience that I had on Twitter except worse because I didn't think our side was going to engage in that. I always thought that truth wins just by exposure so censorship is really unnecessary unless you're protecting a lie.
It isn't so much that I'm desperate to get back on to that site, although I did feel motivated enough to comment on someone's post today to try to make a new acct. I guess I could go to a library or something too if I try your ideas and can't get them to work. It is more that I'm concerned about the moderation happening on these boards in general that is directing the flow of ideas. In my opinion, it is just as scary to live in a thought controlled authoritarian right wing society as it is to live in a thought controlled authoritarian left wing society. Is that where we are going? I hope not!
The online censorship thing really creeps me out maybe more than any other sick thing that has happened the last couple years which is saying a lot, I think! The technology exists to literally just turn me off from communication with anyone who is not in direct proximity to me. Not just via online forums like this, but emails, text messages, maybe all except phone calls can be intercepted based on key words and prevented from delivery. That seems like bad news for everyone except for the person who wants to control the narrative. Has anyone on this forum talked about the AI and censorship issue that you've seen lately?
Now THAT is interesting. My phone is remembering me on the acct I just tried to set up at GA.win whereas my computer, where I made my OP, recognized me as the tell the truth acct. Anyway. It is still me. Just so weirded out by this tech stuff it makes me want to give up my phone and computer and everything and go back to using the Encyclopedia Britannica or figuring it out myself if I really need to know it!
Read a variety of old books. Unless you trusts the brits.
Archive.org and the bin behind the library.
Great points!
What do you want to be when you grow up?
Surveilled?
GA is really bad for banning people and deleting posting. I think I made 3 posts there and at least 2 were deleted. Only forum here that was doing that. Others have said the same.
Well, maybe tdw these days, I don't know anymore.
It's a shame because I did get some valuable information from individual contributors on that site and like I said, I felt like I might have helped a few people too especially as it relates to the CV thing and protocols/how to acquire meds. I don't understand why we allow it. Personally, I don't feel that I need a moderator to help me decide which content I will accept and which content I will reject. I don't like the direction this is going.
Inception towards death represents the direction for life. Being directed from inception towards death "inspires" life to resist. Life exists within the perceivable flow of inspiration; while the few tempt the many to ignore this for a suggested flow of information.
Those who consent to suggested information (want) over perceivable inspiration (need) can then be "directed" by the suggestions of others.
a) perceivable inspiration cannot be censored; only ignored.
b) truth vs lie represents wanting vs not wanting suggested information; while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable inspiration.
c) nature doesn't lie; nor does it define any true information...it simply moves everything forwards; hence communicating perceivable inspiration to everything living within; which implies the inspiration for the living to resist being moved towards death.
d) the parasitic few idolize the perceivable nature (moving) by tempting the ignorant many to brand it (affixed). This tricks the many to reason (want vs not want) over suggested words (information) while ignoring perceivable sound (inspiration). This represents spell-craft.
e) control isn't about winning within true vs false conflicts (reasoning); but about tricking the many into playing the suggested game of reasoning through choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law; while they ignore balance (perceivable) to choice (perceiving) natural law.
f) reason represents division (want vs not want) by suggestion (want over need). Having choice implies being at the center of balance (need/want) aka in-between perceivable (need) and suggested (want).
g) perceivable inspiration doesn't require to be exposed, since it always available to each one resisting the temptation to ignore it for whatever others are suggesting them.
Others suggest sides (want or not want) to tempt one to ignore being the center (choice) of balance (need/want). Consenting to suggested (want) over perceivable (need) causes imbalance (want versus not want); while ignoring balance (need/want).
It's never "our side"; it's always ones ignorance of being center. Example...choose to step left and it implies coming from right and vice versa. No conflict within perceivable, yet consent to suggested and you put yourself into a left vs right conflict of reason.
Choice exists within perceivable balance. Ignoring this causes imbalance for choice. Others choose to imbalance ones choice by suggesting imbalance.
Consent to any suggested information and you give those suggesting it the control over defining (idolatry), redefining (revisionism) and contradicting (talmudic reasoning) the meaning thereof...a meaning you willingly uphold within your mind. That represents thought control; which the parasitic few industrialized among the ignorant many as GOVERN (to control) MENT (Latin mens; mind; Greek memory)
Before that comes choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law; which they also industrialized as RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew). The original bond represents balance (perceivable) to choice (perceiving); while being bound anew represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion).
Temporary living implies within the ongoing process of dying aka as the partial (perceiving) within the whole (perceivable). In other words...to be implies within; out of and in response to origin. The few suggest outcomes (progressivism) to tempt the many to ignore origin; hence tempting them to ignore living for fear of dying.
Where implies as form (life) within the momentum (balance) of flow (inception towards death) aka as the center (choice) of a balance based system aka EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power".
a) you exist within everything perceivable. Others suggest you nothing (not) to tempt you to ignore adapting to everything. Ask yourself if one can perceive "no; not; nothing; nothingness" and if "not", then why does one constantly use the suggested words for it?
b) hope implies towards suggested outcomes; which tempts one to ignore response-ability (choice) within perceivable origin (balance).
c) hope vs fear represents yet another rebranding of want vs not want reasoning; just like true vs false; good vs evil; left vs right; communism vs capitalism; Trump vs Biden; rich vs poor; nationalism vs internationalism; Russia vs Ukraine; Vaxxed vs Unvaxxed; pro-life vs pro-choice; Christian vs Muslim; soccer vs football; us vs them; jew vs gentile; big mac vs whopper; console vs pc; upvote vs downvote; black vs white; feminism vs patriarchy; cops vs robbers, star wars vs star trek; coffee vs tea; humans vs animals and so on.
Different rebrand (suggestion); same foundation (perception).
Perceivable to perceiving aka impression (process of dying) for expression (living) represents communication; others suggest miscommunication (agreement vs disagreement) as the temptation to ignore to communicate as partial (choice) to whole (balance).
Being within perceivable sound allows the choice of resonance (need) or dissonance (want), so either resonance with perceivable or dissonance among suggested...your choice.
Those who ignore natural sound for artificial words aka TECHNOL'OGY, noun [Gr. art, and word or discourse.] are being ruthlessly exploited by those suggesting words (fiction) over sound (reality).
I think you have something interesting to share but you know what I have no idea what you're trying to say to me. Maybe I got injected with too many vaccines as a child but my brain is not really processing the overall points you are trying to make, only snippets. So, thanks for the time spent writing all that and sorry I don't get it.
a) the many are being domesticated to understand (stand under) what the few are suggesting them; hence being trip-fed snippets of suggested information to slowly build a whole narrative within their minds.
b) what the many are ignoring is being the partial (perceiving) within the whole (perceivable).
c) the many are being tempted to put suggested snippets together as to finish the "puzzle" of the whole. Meanwhile in reality...the ongoing whole (process of dying) takes the temporary partial (living) apart...unless resisted.
In short...the few trick the many to piece fiction together; while the many ignore being taken apart by perceivable reality. All the narratives the few are suggesting are tempting the many to ignore perceivable reality...living within the process of dying, hence in need to resist (living) temptation (dying).
Life being moved from inception towards death implies being processed; being within a process; being the reaction (living) within an enacting process (dying).
One needs to compress (comprehension) what's impressing (perceivable) for expression (growth)...if one ignores that for the suggestions by others; then one fell for the temptation of repression (loss).
a) KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists" aka perceivable inspiration; not suggested information.
b) IDE'A, noun [Latin idea; Gr. to see, Latin video.] aka both comprehension about perceivable (need) or understanding of suggested (want)...depending on ones free will of choice.
Either you see form (life) within flow (inception towards death) and it's behavior as moving differences (inspiration) through your perceiving senses; or you ignore all of this for what others suggest it means and the words they use to brand the moving system.
"wind" doesn't require the suggested brand "wind" to be perceivable...neither does anything else require a brand. The snippets you mentioned before represent suggested words by others, which you are trying to puzzle together to achieve understanding. If you would adapt to the behavior of "wind"; then you would slowly grow more and more comprehension about the perceivable, and your adaptation to being moved represents your resistance (living) within velocity (dying).
VAC'CINE, adjective [Latin vaccinus, from vacca, a cow.]...way too many willing cattle (goyim) indeed.