It's a bit of a rabbit trail because I am a geography and genealogy nerd but bear with me.

We know that the Bible, as well as Assyrian inscriptions, record the dispersion of the ten Northern Tribes of Israel to the east. Under Sargon II, they were expelled to somewhere in Media (modern-day central Iran) to a place they called Arzareth in I and II Esdras. From there, history gets vague, but we know that by 300 BC a people from the south that spoke a distinct language unlike others in the region, were monotheistic, and were heavily militarized (all hallmarks of Israelite culture) moved into what is now Armenia and Georgia. Some of the kingdoms they settled were known as Iberia, Colchis, and Albania. Some of them traveled to the TRanscaspian region as well, settling what we know today as Turkmenistan and southeastern Kazakhstan.

Before I go further, we need to go over how linguistics changed between the ~750 BC exile and ~300 BC entrance to the Caucasus. We know from historical data and resources that languages will often evolve rapidly during times of cultural upheaval such as an exile or a diaspora. The Hebrews eventually named themselves the Children of Isaac, or Bani Isaac. Further, Pashtun tradition holds that a breakaway group, the Bani Hishraal, was deported by the Mede-Persian Empire to Afghanistan. The Hebrews, however, still called themselves Hebrews, though it had changed to the point where Hebr or Hber was acceptable. It's not hard to see a change from Hber or Hebr to Iber (Iberia) or Habr (Albania - Habania was another term for Ancient Albania in some of the Hellenic-era inscriptions in the caucasus). Colchis was likely an assimilation of Hebrews with existing coastal tribes, as maritime trade apparently continued unabated with Greece during that time. However, Bani Isaac did eventually become Iscaak through assimilation and/or evolution. Of interesting note is that the Albanian capital was Qabala. It should also be noted that tribal distinctions died out not long after the deportations and exiles.

From Iscaak comes the Greek term Scythian via Iscyk, a term that seems to have come from Iberia looking at language databases and Wikipedia. Scythian culture, regardless of whether "experts" are doing the talking or not, undoubtedly came from the Caucasus and Transcaspian regions.

Anyone here who has read even a little about Tartaria, Khazaria, etc knows that the Scythians were a catchall term for a distinct "breed" of people that travels from the Caucasus into the Russian and Ukrainian steppes, and later migrated into Europe, assimilating with the existing culture but bringing their own culture as well.

Tartaria and Khazaria refers to the Hebrews who continued to revolt even after so much hardship and were banished from the migratory Hebrew nation. The rest of the Hebrews, who apparently either still followed Yahweh (a name that is obviously attested to in Nordic and Celtic religious tradition though heavily evolved) or were basically doing what they had done during the 40 years in the Wilderness.

Now we get into the fun stuff. By about 300 AD, the Roman Empire was starting to realize that something was up to the northeast of their empire. Repeated incursions by previously peaceful border tribes became more and more frequent, and it seems like they were running from a great army. This army turned out to be what we know today as the Celts and Goths. The Romans named some of the bands of Celts "Cimbrae," from a cultural demonym the Scythians often used, Scibri or Scibra. The Slavs, which is a term whose origin is not related to any Hebrew or Scythian word that I can find, was probably descended from a tribal legend or something. The Romans and Byzantines barely interacted with them until the Serbs and Croats arrived in about 500 AD.

After the European Migratory Period, the Celts, Cimbrae, Goths, and Slavs grew into the nations familiar to us today in basically all of Europe (Wales, Scotland, Basque, Albania and Greece are the only modern nations whose current inhabitants cannot be traced back to the Hebrews). In turn, virtually all of the Americas is descended or related to the Hebrews, and the figure increases further if theories of Hebrews migrating to the Americas are to be believed.

The Tartarians and Khazarians rejected God and truth, and have been influencing the world from the throne of Satan. So yes, the "Jews" are bad. The Hebrews are still God's favored and chosen people.

For those who are skeptical of this idea, consider the following:

• Europeans are considered "Caucasian." This implies that we all came from Caucasia.
• The term "Ten Lost Tribes" is generally considered Archaic now, since new archaeology has discovered that the exiled Hebrews didn't die out or assimilate into the local population, maintaining a distinct cultural identity.
• The Israelites were militaristic, as were the Celts, Cimbrae, Slavs, and Goths. Most other militaristic cultures at the time were static, except the Scythian progeny, of which Europe and Asia would not see a rival to until the Mongols and Turks (Turks are another interesting Geogeneaology rabbit trail.
• God promised in Revelation, Ezekiel, and other prophetic books that Israel would be saved until the last day. 144,000 would be chosen from the throng. This is a large number for it to be a special occasion, implying that Israel would be this stupendously large nation (think China or India).
• Europe has historically been the world's center of trade, science, academia, intellect, culture, imperialism, innovation, technology, etc. They have obviously been shined on by God's grace. Only recently has technological innovation declined to the point where the rest of the world is catching up. Hmm, I wonder why?

TLDR: Hebrews - Caucasians - Scythians - Celts/Cimbrae/Slavs/Goths/Tartaria/Khazaria - us/[them]