It's called normalization.
I can imagine that if you are Christian before the end of Rome you are treated as badly as a Transgender in the 1950s.
Of course the goal is to introduce a degenerate ideology, make it look like a good thing and use it to get you to tread on eggshells, and potentially use it to cause death or destruction. (LGBT ideologies are deliberately engineered to justify mass genocide, but Zionist God Emperors masquerading as "Catholics" starved BILLIONS of Europeans over a millenia, and covid world would end the same way after a decade)
In the past we burnt people by the stake if they worship Zeus. Now you can't even ask if someone is Gay or transgender under the fear of retribution. And if you go out without a mask you are equal to a leper. Times had never changed, so are the powers.
(Do I need to compare 4kids with the woke movement?)
Once all the chaos is over you'll integrate it into a part of your life, and the rest of your generations too.
Soon the number of people all over the world that you cannot even be ascertain of their gender or sexual preference will be around the same number as the ones who worship a God that tells the peasants how to live. And everyone will wear a mask outside soon.
Good luck, you'll need it. We think we're smart and enlightened but we're no different from them.
"The degenerate pariahs of society."
Well, for starters, they're not grooming kids for sex. Sexual deviance is a sin and Christians try to avoid it. Hmm, they actually couldn't not much more different. But you already knew that, didn't you?
Had you heard of the papacy pedophile scams or pederasty shit in the Middle Ages?
The pope is grooming kids and telling you how to live as you get starved by landlords.
And I repeat it's not even anything comparable to now, I meant people LITERALLY freezing and starving to bare bones. Imagine Stalin but for ONE THOUSAND YEARS.
Well personally I don't subscribe to the notion of a papal authority. But, about half of Christian's do. Those actions are condemnable even by the church itself. They've been removed from power in many cases. They cannot be ordained. This is different than LGBTQ where deviant is seen as a qualification or even as a virtue.
Consenting to those who suggest Christianity "e nomine" (in the name of) represents subscribing (submitting) to the authority of those who institute papacies as figureheads; leaders to tempt following; personas to attract cults etc.
Watching these muppets being build up; corrupting and crumble down distracts from RELIGION; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew"; hence being bound by consent to those who suggest "e nomine" the lord thy God. That bond to the suggestions of others; while ignoring the perceivable origin of "the lord thy God" represents ignoring the first commandment.
What does it imply that the suggestion of a "papal authority" by others (not by the lord thy God) can tempt about half of Christians to yet again break the first commandment when consenting to those who suggest "e nomine"?
How can there an suggested order which cannot; when the perceivable natural order implies that everything can within?
Being a follower of the lord thy God implies reaction to enacting. Suggesting judgment upon the "actions" of others represents ignoring to react to perceivable origin.
How could CONDEMN, verb - "to disapprove, to doom, to devote; to pronounce to be utterly wrong; to utter a sentence of disapprobation against; to censure; to blame" by suggestion not be in ignorance of perceivable source? How can a believer in God disapprove of those God approved of without ignoring God?
If you try this in Ancient Rome or Ancient Northern Europe, I bet they'll view Christianity the same way.
Normalization is a thing.
Ancient Rome persecuted Christians. They used them as a source of their own amusement. They were counter cultural until Constantine. He legislated that the state religion would change to Christianity. This isn't the preferred approach but it has a lot of influence obviously
All Catholics are Christians, but not all Christians are Catholic.
You’re pushing an atheist deception that because bad people do things in the name of religion, all those who are religious must do bad things... unless of course, they are Muslim, or Buddist, or Jewish, or Hindi.
No practicing Catholic is a Christian. The reason? To be a Christian you kind of need to follow Christ.
Catholics follow child raping pedophiles and people who engage in "drug fueled homosexual orgies", and they ignore the prescriptions and proscriptions found in the Bible.
Thank goodness people are waking up to the scam/cult that is christcuckery.
It has less to do with religion than all of Western history is consisted of proud, living and loving humans rolling over and dying to God-like elites since the fall of Rome.
It's not a coincidence, nothing is.
People abuse religion for their own purposes, and that doesn't change the message of the religion.
As humans, we need a reliable moral compass, otherwise we will simply keep fucking each over relentlessly in order to reach the top of the pack and spread as much of our genetic material as we can.
After 2000 years of study, I think we can all agree the message of Jesus is a much better starting point for a moral compass than the moral compass of a piece of shit atheist like Mao or Stalin.
a) ELITE; noun (French élite) - "selection choice"
b) RELIGION; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew"; which implies choice (consent) towards choice (suggestion) contract law.
Consent by choice "selects" those who suggest the consented to. The many ignoring being the ones with choice within perceivable for the suggested choices of the few, makes the few the chosen ones; the elite.