first off. every single method we use to date artifacts or bones is total guess work. Take carbon dating. Every single thing that we carbon dated during the 60, 70s and 80s is waayyyyyyyy off. All the bomb testing in the atmosphere royal fucked the base line carbon levels resulting in much old dates.
this is still a problem now because each lab has there own calibration techniques.
they even admit its off by at least 3000 years either way
the geological column is another one people like to use to date stuff. the deeper it is the older right? well not quite.
the geological column was realized in the late 1800 and the man who invented the idea was a farmer who believed that earth never ever experienced any sort of world wide natural disasters and everything must have taken millions of years to form.
each layer of ground was slowly deposited naturally over millions of millions of years is what they say. The only problem is that they have found fossils standing upright that cut right through millions of years of strata. tons of trees, animal fossils, a complete whale. all standing straight up as if they were buried suddenly in one big ass dump.
they dont talk much about this though cus it fucks the timeline into the ground. The best example of this shitshow is what happens when dino bones are carbon dated. Labs have done some carbon dating on dinos, they wont usually do it but with the right price anything goes in science
both a Trex and multiple triceratops was dated to less then 30 000 years. Dinos probably weren't what we think either. Im not saying they weren't real, some are probably faked but we did have big reptiles roaming the earth, but not like what we were told.
some had fur, some might have been warm blooded, and a lot of the smaller ones had feathers and were most likely flightless birds. like a turkey with teeth and claws.
They might have even lived along side the maga fauna and Neanderthal. carbon dating and other shit aside they have found some soft tissue from a trex. So they're not that old.
speaking of Neanderthal, ancient human is a bigger mess then dinos.
I thought that there were multiple different humans. Neanderthal, cro magnon man, denisovian, homo erectus, homo habilis ECT. Theirs 10 or so now.
anyway after comparing there actual skulls to those of a chimp or ancient chip (australopithecine) I cant help but doubt my pervious view point. All of the archaic humans are probably just chimp fossils.
the only skulls you can actually say are human are the cro magnon and Neanderthal (we can included Denisovan for now, but bare in mind they only have 1 tooth a finger bone and some bone shards, no skull has been found for them yet)
Neanderthal is often found with shitty tools and cro magnon man have more advanced tools, clothing and artifacts. One was even found with shit loads of gold and jewels (obvious ruler). Neanderthal is always found with bone wood and stone tools and often in cave deposits.
genetic testing shows that cro magnon mans DNA is the exact same as people from Sweden. light skin, blonde hair and blue eyes. Neanderthal is closest to modern Asian
it appears as far back as we go there have always been a slave class.
they developed cultures all through Europe, the middle east Asian, and the artic region.
Denisovan might have been a result of the the two classes of hominid interbreeding. from the bones we know they were much larger then both Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon man and they share ancestry with the Neanderthal.
nephilim anyone?
I think alot of our mythological tales come from this time in history, the age of gods and dragons.
some massive natural disaster happen (3000BC ish), only small pockets of people living in mountains and high land survived ,everything was reset and we entered the age of kings soon after with ancient Sumer
the sphinx, Göbekli Tepe, jerico, Ħal Saflieni Hypogeum are all pre disaster builds.
you bring up an interesting point. We dont know how long people actually lived for. when i looked into how they approximate age it seems that they base it on teeth condition. If they have good teeth there under 40, if they have worn teeth they say there old.
if i had to guess id say some did live longer, but i dont have any proof to back that up so i didnt include that.
but if that was the case it opens up alot of weird doors
I heard anecdotally from a non-expert that teeth lasted a lot longer before we had refined sugar. That might also skew the results.