Sandy Hook and Newton residents threatened and bribed to shut up
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (79)
sorted by:
What would be considered irrefutable evidence?
I am not an expert, but allowing independent investigators access to the forensics would be a start. Much more transparency.
And just to let you know, it looks to me like kids were actually murdered in that building. Why all the theatrics? Why treat the affair like a secret?
What theatrics?
Who would be wanting that investigation though? No parents, as far as I know, have ever questioned the investigation the state police did.
Conspiracy theorists seem to be the ones who want an investigation, but to get one they'd have to go through the state police. The same people they think were part of the hoax.
I think the news media made quite a show out of Sandy Hook. There were unbelievable interviews and the whole thing was sensationalized to an extreme.
I believe a large number of people would like to see an independent investigation with verifiable evidence. That group of people is in no way limited to the victims' parents as you imply. It is not necessary to "go through the state police" as you claim. You are calling people names.
The only people who want an independent investigation are people that believe Sandy Hook was a hoax. No parent or family has come out and said they do not believe what the cops found in their investigation.
Any investigation would have to rely a lot on what the state police collected. Thoe hoax believers say the state police was part of the hoax, would they believe in the evidence the state police give them?