Sandy Hook and Newton residents threatened and bribed to shut up
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (79)
sorted by:
"reports of a gag order"
Is there a link to any of those letters or do we have to just believe Fetzer?
There are two photos of children being led through the parking lot.
https://imgur.com/nIB80He
https://imgur.com/2aI2qyg
If the children were rearranged, point out the kids that are in both photos.
You can by a copy of any of the death certificates for $20 each.
https://portal.ct.gov/DPH/Vital-Records/Death-Certificates
The victims photos and names are redacted from the publicly released report. That's not unusual.
There is an interview with Paul Preston in Fetzer's bnook. Preston says an Obama administration official told him Sandy Hook was real. We have to believe what Preston says, this official is not named.
The Sedensky report matched the shaell casings found to the Bushmaster found in the school.
Page 37.
https://portal.ct.gov/DCJ/Latest-News/Sandy-Hook-Investigation/Danbury-States-Attorney-Releases-Report-on-Sandy-Hook-Investigation
No report or document says the school was closed. It's speculation based on the crime scene photos.
Haddad being Nancy Lanza is just someone's opinion, not a fact. Same with Adam being fabricated.
Connecticutt is a small state, is it surprising relatives of people also work for the state Government?
Yerah why would cops who saw twenty murdered first graders need counseling? Just suck it up and go back to work.
Thank you for the photos. Any idea about the police car dashcam video that was redacted?
The government can falsify any document without restriction.
Thanks for clarification. Personally, I don't find that acceptable.
Like hell we do.
" Any idea about the police car dashcam video that was redacted?"
It was redacted the same reason the names were in the report, privacy.
Yes, the Government can falsify documents, but those documents could also be real. It's a common thing, no matter what conspiracy it is, people ask for a piece of evidence. But when they get it, they just say it's fake.
Sorry, but you can't expect any serious person looking into a possible government hoax to accept this.
That's why it is important to press for irrefutable evidence. When you have a laundry list of reasons why people can't have it then of course some of them are going to wonder.
What would be considered irrefutable evidence?