Hubble photos are fake like colorized, old-timey B&W photos are "fake".
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
a) you represent the different reaction (living) within the same action (dying). Can you tell the difference between living and dying while being alive? What if you need to grow comprehension of perceivable (action) by adaptation (reaction) to it? The more you adapt to the process of dying; the more you comprehend about living within it.
b) PROP'ER, adjective [Latin proprius] - "peculiar; naturally or essentially belonging to a person or thing; not common"...does living belong to a person (per sonos aka by sound) or does it represent a part of the common process of dying (source of sound)?
c) "to tell" implies suggesting to others what perceivable means. If those others consent; they are tempted to ignore the perceivable source for you as the suggested substitute. This has being going on for so long that the many now believe that the need to tell each other what reality means; instead of adapting to predefined reality impressing upon them.
Back to the breathing example...try holding your breath while telling others what breathing means. Let's see what's more important...the perceivable need to breathe or the suggested explanation thereof? The many simply ignore reality for the fiction the few suggest them, and are now at the point of lacking to comprehend the consequences of ignorance.
a) you represent the single entry and charge (account) within the momentum of an ongoing system. You (life) are in-between coming (inception) and going (death) and you will be until the moment you're gone.
b) "never know" represents the contradiction of "everything perceivable (know) with the suggestion of "nothing ever" (never). Question how perception operates; while trying to find a position within perceivable for "nothing". The parasitic few simply suggest the word "nothing" as a branding for ones choice to ignore "everything" perceivable.
c) who's responsible for lack of "self" discernment? Could it be ones response-ability (choice) to grow self discernment? How could the account of one grow if trying to grow it within "nothing"?
You represent the commotion within the natural order aka the temporary resistance (living) within the ongoing velocity (dying). Living implies the agitation of struggling to resist the ongoing temptation of dying.
The many are tempted to blame suggested causes; instead of growing comprehension about being the effect within the only perceivable cause.
Both states of the bowl (expression/repression) coexist with each other as growth/loss aka balance (the momentum of motion). You represent the choice within the bowl to either grow within (living) or diminish yourself back out into the ongoing loss (dying).
The expression when yet another logger tells the same offensive joke... https://pic8.co/sh/rIMr5Q.jpg
Resist the temptation of formed water and tap the constant "flow" of perceivable inspiration...lots more to reckon in there.
"People ask me why"..."I never find a place to stop"..."And settle down, down, down"
"But I never wanted all those things"..."People need to justify"..."Their lives, lives, lives"
"Yes we were born, born...Born to be alive"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9UaJAnnipkY
In other words...to be alive implies being born out of NATURE, noun - "born, produced"; hence in response to origin...not for the living.
The liver of life represents the temporary perception of the ongoing; only perceivable at this temporary moment. The motion of energy represents the origin, while the formed perception within represents being able to experience it temporarily, and more specifically...momentarily.
At this moment each of ones choices represents ones first step...there's no second within energy.
Being the perceiving one within all perceivable implies lacking comprehension of all perceivable for those perceiving it. The few suggest outcomes (want of everything) to tempt the many to ignore adapting to origin (need to grow one-thing within everything).
The temptation of want represents the temptation of dying; while ignoring the need to resist among the living. Temptation represents the "fast track" to a strained and shortened life.
Need/want represents the balance for ones choice within all perceivable. One doesn't need to restrict perceivable; one needs to grow comprehension thereof; which would increase efficiency of the consciousness memory to handle more and more of the perceivable.
"as much as needed" represents the temporary choice adapting to ongoing balance aka as much temporary resistance as needed within ongoing temptation. A perceived skirt too short represents both increasing temptation and decreasing resistance to it; hence inspiring the need to grow more resistance; while also tempting to want more of less (skirt that is).
Opinions represent suggested information; which tempts others to reason (want vs not want) about it. Resisting the temptation of reason (want vs not want) for implication (if/then) will show you what's going on... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sen8Tn8CBA4
What are they stealing from dogs? Their flees?
The good ol' metal to gold alchemy scheme.
Meanwhile one of the servers plugged the leftovers; put them on a hotspot and routed them for anonymous consumption.
The moving on implies being choice at the center of momentum until being moved to the finish.
Growth within loss aka living within the process of dying represents the scale; while the retired mind represents the state of being tempted by aging to ignore resisting (growth) temptation (loss).
Those lacking self discernment are tempted to fear "spending" remaining life by resisting dying; which ignores that all resistance represents a reinvestment.
CARD, verb - "to gain" + TRICK, noun (Latin intrico) - "to fold"...that tempts one to ignore that nature gives by unfolding.
a) "is for" implies "is forwarded"; hence to be (life) within forward motion (inception towards death).
b) "belong" represents being partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable); yet as a suggestion; the term "belong" tempts others to want to claim belongings. This is why one cannot use suggestion to define perceivable without causing corruption within oneself and others.
c) being one reaction (choice) within all enacting (balance) implies being at the center...a fully submerged form within the flow of inspiration. What one is tempted to dabble in is the lack of comprehension about how deep the perceivable foundation can be. You ain't dipping within the unknown; you're peaking at all knowledge (perceivable) surrounding you. Growing your comprehension represents opening those eyes (somewhere an Asian reading this will flip me off).
a) the perceivable represents everything already told to the perceiving.
b) discernment has to be grown by oneself; not suggested by telling others.
c) if one cannot perceive sameness; then one lacks discernment about being within perceivable differentiation. In other words...to perceive implies to be able to discern from one another; hence acknowledging moving differences (inspiration). It's suggested information which tempts one to categorize aka to slap the perceivable differences under a suggestible umbrella. E pluribus unum (out of many; one) is what the parasitic few are suggesting the ignorant many to consent to aka the suggested inversion of the perceivable order.
How could you express action without reacting to all others within the never ending sequence? How could you express (living) without being impressed (dying) upon? A sequence (following) implies reacting (life) to a direction (inception towards death).
How cruel is it to suggest the many to constantly reason about original vs sequel; while they ignore being the sequel (living) within origin (dying)? Whenever the many proclaim "the sequel sucks; I go back to the original"; the few are pissing themselves in astonishment over ignorance....if they can be arsed to even look.
What if flow distinguishes itself into form; which in return demands adaptation from form to flow? Breathing represents reaction to enacting motion aka compressing and expressing the impressing. It's also flow that "cuts itself short" into form; hence from whole into partial; which allows the partial to grow within the whole; hence increasing the power of resistance (living) within the power of velocity (dying).
In short...your perception represents the distinguished; while your lack of comprehending the perceivable represents the as of yet untapped power for you to grow.
Here's another inversion going on...being helpful represents the suggested inversion of FULL (all perceivable) HELPING those within to BE (the ones perceiving).
"getting head" implies her getting down; living implies her (form) growing up within him (flow). While I'm at the sleazy rhetoric...suggested blowjob represents the inversion of being the resistance within work (energy), hence not working for relief; but for sustenance.
That would be two bucks in the naughty word jar for me; but last I checked we had broccoli sprouts growing in those jars.
The "I" goes on within each different vessel coming back in. Everyone represents an "I" for oneself and a "you" for all other ones.
Sleight of hand: "I am whatever you say I am; cause if I wasn't; then why would I say I am"...that line represents suggestion; while the name of the song "the way I am" represents comprehension of the perceivable.
No matter how mean you respond to other form; the reign of flow cannot be held back.
That's more naughty innuendo from back when men had to hunt their prey beneath bushes; isn't it?
Choice: "Suggestion; did you broke the handle off perception again?"
Suggestion: "What if you did it to yourself?"
Choice: "If it wasn't my own; I would kick your ass"
If nothing else; you gotta have style.
Ever seen these ancient over the shoulders water bucket carrier? What's it called in English?...Yoke!. That represents the scale that puts your choice at the center of balance. Moving with it implies constant adaptation to stay within balance.
Tempts one to ignore being a thing with discernment within an ongoing system.
Rhyming represents reconfiguration of predeFINEd sound perceived. You already got the fine you want to land. It's the want (suggested) which ignores the need (perceivable); hence corrupting the comprehension of perceivable.
This suggestion tempts to contemplate the descriptions "bowl; turning; inside out and upside down"; while ignoring being inside constant change; in-between up/down balance. One can shape the bowl; one can turn the bowl any which way; but only within the momentum of an ongoing system.
To contemplate ignores ongoing (perceivable inspiration) for temporary (suggested information)...hence contemplating the brands; the descriptions; the idols of meaning; instead of what's moving them.
Finding level; hence adaptation to momentum (balance within motion), while DOUBT, verb - "to waver or fluctuate in opinion" represents the choice in-between, hence the waves and flow of water; while finding level.
That represents the temptation of velocity tempting those within to ignore resisting.
Club (whole guitar); shield (body); stick (fretboard); improvised caltrops (tuning heads) and a bunch of choke strings. I could escape a confrontation with all that; but playing it would probably be quicker to get others to escape.
Where does one step within? Momentum aka the ever changing moment, hence every step representing the first step for every one within. One remembering previous steps represents the temptation to ignore that which is for that which was. Everything that was moments before; now is within this moment.
Motion represents the origin; those within its momentum the sequels. The suggested steps of others: may they wear seven-league boots or stepping barefoot into dogshit, represent ever changing circumstances for choice to use as inspiration or tempting information.
ALL can be found by each ONE within. Want for "more" implies lack to comprehend everything needed to grow oneself within.
I saw my dogs baring their teeth at the neighbors dogs we had over the holidays: while sharing food. Always ready to fight each other for every unclaimed piece. The same dogs would carefully try to nibble around one of my kids spontaneously deciding to start digging among the dog food for who knows what treasures.
It's like "sharing is caring until it's otherkin". I think my dogs could handle a bunch of monkeys.
If the heat is on their trail; they're gonna pop...
COSMOS - "the universe" aka ones within oneness aka plural within the center of singular.
All represents one in energy.
Growth (life) starts (inception) and ends (death) within loss (dying).
A suggestion as valid as the 15k year radioactive fallout periods aka stay the fuck away from out landgrab operations because this geiger counter makes noises. And while you all are busy being concerned about the shit we can't get rid off; remember that peak oil is just around the corner...