Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

24
CDC whistleblower reveals the life expectancy of the vaccinated. (www.bitchute.com)
posted 3 years ago by HonestTruth 3 years ago by HonestTruth +28 / -4
19 comments share
19 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (19)
sorted by:
▲ 0 ▼
– justified_paranoia 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

After coming here for a while I don't even need to ask, I already know OP has no idea who this lady really is and has also made no attempt to verify her identity or connection to the CDC.

If OP chooses to respond to this comment, it will only be to suggest I must be "one of them" otherwise I would accept this woman's testimony without question.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– HonestTruth [S] 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

Take it as you see it, the choice is yours. For me, it is just a statement made by someone that is relative to a possible conspiracy. I make no requirements of acceptance on what I post, it is discussion material.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– justified_paranoia 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

Then here is the end of the discussion: there is no way to verify who she is and who she works for. Given the insane amount of clickbait geared towards people who mistrust the authorities, and also given the massive risk this woman would be running if she actually worked for the CDC and then spilled the beans, you would have to be a complete idiot to take this seriously.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– HonestTruth [S] 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

She name drops 'Susan Pierce' in the video, it is not the only copy of it online. Verifying her is not my role, I found her statement relevant to the covid/vaccine discussion, be it true or not. You have nothing to discuss that is fine, you want to reject it because it does not fit your narrative, also fine.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– justified_paranoia 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

Are you completely retarded? Just because she says "my name is Susan Pierce and I work for the CDC" doesn't automatically mean she's telling the truth.

If verifying her identity isn't your responsibility then this place is just a science fiction prose forum for amateur creative writers

You are dumber than a middle school child. If you're so certain that I'm only rejecting this video because it "doesn't fit my narrative" then please, tell me what my narrative is. I too happen to believe that the COVID jabs are a deadly scam, but that doesn't mean I'm just going to blindly agree with everything I see which vaguely supports it.

Ugh. Before the industrial revolution, idiots like you had ways of weeding yourselves out of the gene pool. Your simplistic and narrow-minded view of what's happening are nauseating.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - qpl2q (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy