The actions occur and serve as a lens to reveal what lies within.
a) actions implies plural. What if the resulting reactions represent the plural within the single action? The plural reactions of the living within the singular action of dying...
b) OCCUR', verb [Latin occurro] - "to meet; to strike against; to clash"...that implies within the already established balance (momentum) of action/reaction, caused by the pre-occurring motion.
c) SERVE, verb [Latin servio, servo, to keep.] - "to work for". What if work represents EN'ERGY, noun [Greek, work.] - "internal or inherent power" and self differentiation of action into reaction represents the internal power?
d) LENS, noun [Latin lentil.] - "a transparent substance" aka transmuted (perceiving) from parent (perceivable); hence sub (choice) within dom (balance)...the stance of a surfer.
e) to reveal implies that it wasn't revealed before; yet energy had to be before revealed (perceivable) and revelation (perceiving) could coexist within.
f) "to reveal what lies within" implies energy having and simultaneously lacking self discernment. Why would everything (energy) lack something (discernment) and how could the self differentiation within energy represent the source for what's lacking?
On the other hand...the differentiated ONEs (perceiving) out of the self differentiating ALL (perceivable) would require inspiration to grow comprehension about perceivable; hence the growing comprehension to everything already revealed through perception.
Intent motivates action.
a) INTENT', noun - "the stretching of the mind towards an object". That represents the inversion of being form (living) within flow (inception towards death) aka the subject inside the "towards" objectification aka the reaction within enacting. The mind responses to impression (perceivable); which then allows compression (comprehension) for expression (growth), or if ignored, repression (loss).
The few suggest the many objects (idolized subjects) to lure their minds forwards; hence with the flow towards death aka progressivism.
b) MOTIVE (having power to move) -ATION (through action)...that implies being the reaction. As the living I have the power to move left/right; up/down; forward/backward....while being moved from inception towards death. Why? Because my temporary choice to move exists within the momentum (balance) of ongoing motion.
c) "motivates action" translates to "having the power to move through action action". That's a little too much action and much ignored reaction.
Intent is both innate and developed
IN'NATE, adjective [Latin innatus, to be born.] + DEVELOP, verb - "to unfold"...suggested intent tempts one to ignore being within perceivable innate (nature; to be born) development (unfolding mind). Growth of comprehension represents the unfolding of ones mind within all perceivable.
How could life act; if it's reacting to being directed from inception towards death?
The actions occur and serve as a lens to reveal what lies within. Intent motivates action. Intent is both innate and developed.
a) actions implies plural. What if the resulting reactions represent the plural within the single action? The plural reactions of the living within the singular action of dying...
b) OCCUR', verb [Latin occurro] - "to meet; to strike against; to clash"...that implies within the already established balance (momentum) of action/reaction, caused by the pre-occurring motion.
c) SERVE, verb [Latin servio, servo, to keep.] - "to work for". What if work represents EN'ERGY, noun [Greek, work.] - "internal or inherent power" and self differentiation of action into reaction represents the internal power?
d) LENS, noun [Latin lentil.] - "a transparent substance" aka transmuted (perceiving) from parent (perceivable); hence sub (choice) within dom (balance)...the stance of a surfer.
e) to reveal implies that it wasn't revealed before; yet energy had to be before revealed (perceivable) and revelation (perceiving) could coexist within.
f) "to reveal what lies within" implies energy having and simultaneously lacking self discernment. Why would everything (energy) lack something (discernment) and how could the self differentiation within energy represent the source for what's lacking?
On the other hand...the differentiated ONEs (perceiving) out of the self differentiating ALL (perceivable) would require inspiration to grow comprehension about perceivable; hence the growing comprehension to everything already revealed through perception.
a) INTENT', noun - "the stretching of the mind towards an object". That represents the inversion of being form (living) within flow (inception towards death) aka the subject inside the "towards" objectification aka the reaction within enacting. The mind responses to impression (perceivable); which then allows compression (comprehension) for expression (growth), or if ignored, repression (loss).
The few suggest the many objects (idolized subjects) to lure their minds forwards; hence with the flow towards death aka progressivism.
b) MOTIVE (having power to move) -ATION (through action)...that implies being the reaction. As the living I have the power to move left/right; up/down; forward/backward....while being moved from inception towards death. Why? Because my temporary choice to move exists within the momentum (balance) of ongoing motion.
c) "motivates action" translates to "having the power to move through action action". That's a little too much action and much ignored reaction.
IN'NATE, adjective [Latin innatus, to be born.] + DEVELOP, verb - "to unfold"...suggested intent tempts one to ignore being within perceivable innate (nature; to be born) development (unfolding mind). Growth of comprehension represents the unfolding of ones mind within all perceivable.